WISE Publications

@article{TansomboonDesigningAutomatedGuidance2017,
title = {Designing Automated Guidance to Promote Productive Revision of Science Explanations},
author = {Charissa Tansomboon and Libby F Gerard and Jonathan M Vitale and Marcia C Linn},
doi = {10.1007/s40593-017-0145-0},
issn = {1560-4292, 1560-4306},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-12-01},
urldate = {2017-11-16},
journal = {International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education},
volume = {27},
number = {4},
pages = {729--757},
keywords = {CLASS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{SvihlaDistributedpracticeclassroom2017,
title = {Distributed Practice in Classroom Inquiry Science Learning},
author = {Vanessa Svihla and Michael J Wester and Marcia C Linn},
doi = {10.1080/23735082.2017.1371321},
issn = {2373-5082, 2373-5090},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-09-01},
urldate = {2017-11-16},
journal = {Learning: Research and Practice},
pages = {1--23},
keywords = {CLASS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{ZertucheHowopenerscontribute2017,
title = {How Do Openers Contribute to Student Learning?},
author = {Amber Zertuche and Libby Gerard and Marcia C Linn},
issn = {1307-9298},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-07-01},
urldate = {2017-11-18},
journal = {International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education},
volume = {5},
number = {1},
pages = {79--92},
abstract = {Openers, or brief activities that initiate a class, routinely take up classroom time each day yet little isknown about how to design these activities so they contribute to student learning. This study usestechnology-enhanced learning environments to explore new opportunities to transform Openersfrom potentially busy work to knowledge generating activities. This study compares the impact ofteacher-designed Openers, Opener designs based on recent research emphasizing knowledgeintegration, and no Opener for an 8th grade technology-enhanced inquiry science investigation.Results suggest that students who participate in a researcher-designed Opener are more likely torevisit and refine their work, and to make significant learning gains, than students who do notparticipate in an Opener. Students make the greatest gains when they revisit key evidence in thetechnology-enhanced curriculum unit prior to revision. Engaging students in processes that promoteknowledge integration during the Opener motivate students to revise their ideas. The results suggestdesign principles for Openers in technology-enhanced instruction.},
keywords = {VISUAL},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{LinnDesigningInstructionImprove2017,
title = {Designing Instruction to Improve Lifelong Inquiry Learning},
author = {Marcia C Linn and Bat-Sheva Eylon and Anna Rafferty and Jonathan M Vitale},
doi = {10.12973/eurasia.2015.1317a},
issn = {1305-8215, 1305-8223},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-06-01},
urldate = {2017-11-16},
journal = {Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education},
volume = {11},
number = {2},
pages = {217--225},
abstract = {Citizens need the capability to conduct their own inquiry projects so that they can make sense of claims about new energy policies, health remedies, or financial opportunities. To develop the lifelong capability to grapple with these dilemmas, we report on ways to design precollege units that...},
keywords = {CLASS, GRIDS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{ApplebaumComparingDesignConstraints2017,
title = {Comparing Design Constraints to Support Learning in Technology-Guided Inquiry Projects},
author = {L R Applebaum and J M Vitale and Libby F Gerard and M C Linn},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-01-01},
journal = {Educational Technology & Society},
volume = {20},
number = {4},
pages = {179--190},
keywords = {CLASS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{DonnellyEnhancingstudentexplanations2016,
title = {Enhancing Student Explanations of Evolution: Comparing Elaborating and Competing Theory Prompts: ENHANCING EXPLANATIONS OF EVOLUTION},
author = {Dermot F Donnelly and Bahadir Namdar and Jonathan M Vitale and Kevin Lai and Marcia C Linn},
doi = {10.1002/tea.21331},
issn = {00224308},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-11-01},
urldate = {2017-11-16},
journal = {Journal of Research in Science Teaching},
volume = {53},
number = {9},
pages = {1341--1363},
keywords = {GRIDS, PLANS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{RyooDesigningautomatedguidance2016,
title = {Designing Automated Guidance for Concept Diagrams in Inquiry Instruction: Designing Automated Guidance For Inquiry Learning},
author = {Kihyun Ryoo and Marcia C Linn},
doi = {10.1002/tea.21321},
issn = {00224308},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-09-01},
urldate = {2017-11-16},
journal = {Journal of Research in Science Teaching},
volume = {53},
number = {7},
pages = {1003--1035},
keywords = {CLASS, GRIDS, PLANS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{LaiMeasuringGraphComprehension2016,
title = {Measuring Graph Comprehension, Critique, and Construction in Science},
author = {Kevin Lai and Julio Cabrera and Jonathan M Vitale and Jacquie Madhok and Robert Tinker and Marcia C Linn},
doi = {10.1007/s10956-016-9621-9},
issn = {1059-0145, 1573-1839},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-08-01},
urldate = {2017-11-16},
journal = {Journal of Science Education and Technology},
volume = {25},
number = {4},
pages = {665--681},
keywords = {CLASS, GRIDS, PLANS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{MatukIterativelyRefiningScience2016,
title = {Iteratively Refining a Science Explanation Tool Through Classroom Implementation and Stakeholder Partnerships},
author = {Camillia Matuk and Kevin W McElhaney and Jennifer King Chen and Jonathan Lim-Breitbart and Douglas Kirkpatrick and Marcia C Linn},
doi = {10.14434/ijdl.v7i2.20203},
issn = {2159-449X},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-06-01},
urldate = {2017-11-16},
journal = {International Journal of Designs for Learning},
volume = {7},
number = {2},
abstract = {Science inquiry challenges students to synthesize various ideas about complex phenomena into coherent explanations. It also challenges teachers, who must guide their diverse students' developing understanding during student-paced investigations. We describe the Idea Manager, a suite of web-based, curriculum-integrated tools that (a) guides students' knowledge integration as they generate, distinguish, and reconcile their ideas; and (b) provides means for teachers to monitor learning over the course of technology-enhanced science inquiry units. With the Idea Manager tool, students document short, text-based ideas, tag and sort them along various attributes, and exchange them with classmates. At culminating points of their investigations, students graphically organize their ideas to prepare written scientific explanations. Meanwhile, logs of idea entries, revisions, and meta-data inform teachers' and researchers' decisions about instruction and design.This paper offers an account of the design moves made in refining the Idea Manager, and highlights the importance of teacher-researcher partnerships and classroom implementations. Through designers' artifacts, classroom research findings, and teachers' and researchers' reflections, we illustrate the tool's origins; our strategies for testing new features and eliciting stakeholders' feedback, and how middle and high school classroom implementations inform the tool's continued iterations. Based on learning theory and on our own 40+ collective years of classroom teaching experience, we explain our design decisions and describe how new features and patterns for the tool's use emerged from a community of researchers. Finally, we reflect on the process of iteration that advances both theory and design, and on the value of pedagogically-driven technology design.},
keywords = {CLASS, GRIDS, PLANS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{MatukGatheringRequirementsTeacher2016,
title = {Gathering Requirements for Teacher Tools: Strategies for Empowering Teachers Through Co-Design},
author = {Camillia Matuk and Libby Gerard and Jonathan Lim-Breitbart and Marcia Linn},
doi = {10.1007/s10972-016-9459-2},
issn = {1046-560X, 1573-1847},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-02-01},
urldate = {2017-11-16},
journal = {Journal of Science Teacher Education},
volume = {27},
number = {1},
pages = {79--110},
keywords = {CLASS, GRIDS, PLANS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{LiuValidationautomatedscoring2016,
title = {Validation of Automated Scoring of Science Assessments},
author = {Ou Lydia Liu and Joseph A Rios and Michael Heilman and Libby Gerard and Marcia C Linn},
doi = {10.1002/tea.21299},
issn = {1098-2736},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-02-01},
urldate = {2017-11-17},
journal = {Journal of Research in Science Teaching},
volume = {53},
number = {2},
pages = {215--233},
abstract = {Constructed response items can both measure the coherence of student ideas and serve as reflective experiences to strengthen instruction. We report on new automated scoring technologies that can reduce the cost and complexity of scoring constructed-response items. This study explored the accuracy of c-rater-ML, an automated scoring engine developed by Educational Testing Service, for scoring eight science inquiry items that require students to use evidence to explain complex phenomena. Automated scoring showed satisfactory agreement with human scoring for all test takers as well as specific subgroups. These findings suggest that c-rater-ML offers a promising solution to scoring constructed-response science items and has the potential to increase the use of these items in both instruction and assessment. textcopyright 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 53: 215–233, 2016.},
keywords = {CLASS, GRIDS, PLANS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{GerardUsingAutomatedScores2016,
title = {Using Automated Scores of Student Essays to Support Teacher Guidance in Classroom Inquiry},
author = {Libby F Gerard and Marcia C Linn},
doi = {10.1007/s10972-016-9455-6},
issn = {1046-560X, 1573-1847},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-02-01},
urldate = {2017-11-17},
journal = {Journal of Science Teacher Education},
volume = {27},
number = {1},
pages = {111--129},
abstract = {Computer scoring of student written essays about an inquiry topic can be used to diagnose student progress both to alert teachers to struggling students and to generate automated guidance. We identify promising ways for teachers to add value to automated guidance to improve student learning. Three teachers from two schools and their 386 students participated. We draw on evidence from student progress, observations of how teachers interact with students, and reactions of teachers. The findings suggest that alerts for teachers prompted rich teacher–student conversations about energy in photosynthesis. In one school, the combination of the automated guidance plus teacher guidance was more effective for student science learning than two rounds of personalized, automated guidance. In the other school, both approaches resulted in equal learning gains. These findings suggest optimal combinations of automated guidance and teacher guidance to support students to revise explanations during inquiry and build integrated understanding of science.},
keywords = {CLASS, GRIDS, PLANS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{VitaleDistinguishingcomplexideas2016,
title = {Distinguishing Complex Ideas about Climate Change: Knowledge Integration vs. Specific Guidance},
author = {Jonathan M Vitale and Elizabeth McBride and Marcia C Linn},
doi = {10.1080/09500693.2016.1198969},
issn = {0950-0693, 1464-5289},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-01-01},
urldate = {2017-11-16},
journal = {International Journal of Science Education},
volume = {38},
number = {9},
pages = {1548--1569},
keywords = {CLASS, GRIDS, PLANS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{GerardTechnologyInquiryTeaching2016,
title = {Technology as Inquiry Teaching Partner},
author = {Libby Gerard and Camillia Matuk and Marcia C Linn},
doi = {10.1007/s10972-016-9457-4},
issn = {1046-560X, 1573-1847},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-01-01},
urldate = {2017-11-16},
journal = {Journal of Science Teacher Education},
volume = {27},
number = {1},
pages = {1--9},
abstract = {No Abstract available for this article.},
keywords = {CLASS, GRIDS, PLANS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{LinnScienceEducationSeparation2016,
title = {Science Education: From Separation to Integration},
author = {Marcia C Linn and Libby Gerard and Camillia Matuk and Kevin W McElhaney},
doi = {10.3102/0091732X16680788},
issn = {0091-732X},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-01-01},
urldate = {2017-11-16},
journal = {Review of Research in Education},
volume = {40},
number = {1},
pages = {529--587},
abstract = {Advances in technology, science, and learning sciences research over the past 100 years have reshaped science education. This chapter focuses on how investigators from varied fields of inquiry who initially worked separately began to interact, eventually formed partnerships, and recently integrated their perspectives to strengthen science education. Advances depended on the broadening of the participants in science education research, starting with psychologists, science discipline experts, and science educators; adding science teachers, psychometricians, computer scientists, and sociologists; and eventually including leaders in cultural studies, linguistics, and neuroscience. This process depended on renegotiating power structures, deliberate funding decisions by the National Science Foundation and others, and sustained, creative teamwork. It reflects a growing commitment to ensure that all learners are respected and that all students learn to address the complex scientific dilemmas they face in their lives. This chapter traces the evolution of research on science education in the United States with a focus on 5- to 17-year-olds. It highlights trends in the view of the learner, the design of instruction, the role of professional development, and the impact of technology. The chapter closes with recommendations designed to realize the full potential of these advances.},
keywords = {CLASS, GRIDS, PLANS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{SchwendimannComparingtwoforms2016,
title = {Comparing Two Forms of Concept Map Critique Activities to Facilitate Knowledge Integration Processes in Evolution Education: COMPARING TWO FORMS OF CONCEPT MAP CRITIQUE ACTIVITIES},
author = {Beat A Schwendimann and Marcia C Linn},
doi = {10.1002/tea.21244},
issn = {00224308},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-01-01},
urldate = {2017-11-16},
journal = {Journal of Research in Science Teaching},
volume = {53},
number = {1},
pages = {70--94},
keywords = {CLASS, GRIDS, VISUAL},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{GerardAutomatedguidancestudent2016,
title = {Automated Guidance for Student Inquiry.},
author = {Libby F Gerard and Kihyun Ryoo and Kevin W McElhaney and Ou Lydia Liu and Anna N Rafferty and Marcia C Linn},
doi = {10.1037/edu0000052},
issn = {1939-2176, 0022-0663},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-01-01},
urldate = {2017-11-16},
journal = {Journal of Educational Psychology},
volume = {108},
number = {1},
pages = {60--81},
keywords = {CLASS, GRIDS, PLANS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{PetraSupportingstudentsbecome2016,
title = {Supporting Students to Become Autonomous Learners: The Role of Web-Based Learning},
author = {Siti Fatimah Petra and Jainatul Halida Jaidin and JSH Quintus Perera and Marcia Linn},
doi = {10.1108/IJILT-05-2016-0017},
issn = {2056-4880},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-01-01},
urldate = {2017-11-16},
journal = {International Journal of Information and Learning Technology},
volume = {33},
number = {4},
pages = {263--275},
keywords = {CLASS, GRIDS, PLANS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{VitaleTakingadvantageautomated2015,
title = {Taking Advantage of Automated Assessment of Student-Constructed Graphs in Science: AUTO ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT GRAPHS},
author = {Jonathan M Vitale and Kevin Lai and Marcia C Linn},
doi = {10.1002/tea.21241},
issn = {00224308},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-12-01},
urldate = {2017-11-16},
journal = {Journal of Research in Science Teaching},
volume = {52},
number = {10},
pages = {1426--1450},
keywords = {CLASS, GRIDS, VISUAL},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{SvihlaRevisitingretentionanalytic2015,
title = {Revisiting for Retention: An Analytic for Inquiry Science Learning.},
author = {Vanessa Svihla and Michael J Wester and Marcia C Linn},
doi = {10.18608/jla.2015.22.7},
issn = {19297750},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-12-01},
urldate = {2017-11-16},
journal = {Journal of Learning Analytics},
volume = {2},
number = {2},
pages = {75--101},
keywords = {CLASS, GRIDS, PLANS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{GerardAutomatedadaptiveguidance2015,
title = {Automated, Adaptive Guidance for K-12 Education},
author = {Libby Gerard and Camillia Matuk and Kevin McElhaney and Marcia C Linn},
doi = {10.1016/j.edurev.2015.04.001},
issn = {1747938X},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-06-01},
urldate = {2017-11-16},
journal = {Educational Research Review},
volume = {15},
pages = {41--58},
keywords = {CLASS, GRIDS, VISUAL},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{VisintainerSixthGradeStudentsProgress2015,
title = {Sixth-Grade Students' Progress in Understanding the Mechanisms of Global Climate Change},
author = {Tammie Visintainer and Marcia Linn},
doi = {10.1007/s10956-014-9538-0},
issn = {1059-0145, 1573-1839},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-04-01},
urldate = {2017-11-16},
journal = {Journal of Science Education and Technology},
volume = {24},
number = {2-3},
pages = {287--310},
keywords = {CLASS, GRIDS, VISUAL},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{MatukTechnologysupportteachers2015,
title = {Technology to Support Teachers Using Evidence from Student Work to Customize Technology-Enhanced Inquiry Units},
author = {Camillia F Matuk and Marcia C Linn and Bat-Sheva Eylon},
doi = {10.1007/s11251-014-9338-1},
issn = {0020-4277, 1573-1952},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-03-01},
urldate = {2017-11-16},
journal = {Instructional Science},
volume = {43},
number = {2},
pages = {229--257},
keywords = {CLASS, GRIDS, VISUAL},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{LinnUndergraduateresearchexperiences2015,
title = {Undergraduate Research Experiences: Impacts and Opportunities},
author = {M C Linn and E Palmer and A Baranger and E Gerard and E Stone},
doi = {10.1126/science.1261757},
issn = {0036-8075, 1095-9203},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-02-01},
urldate = {2017-11-16},
journal = {Science},
volume = {347},
number = {6222},
pages = {1261757--1261757},
keywords = {CLASS, GRIDS, VISUAL},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{SvihlaDistributedRevisitingAnalytic2015,
title = {Distributed Revisiting: An Analytic for Retention of Coherent Science Learning},
author = {Vanessa Svihla and Michael J Wester and Marcia C Linn},
issn = {1929-7750},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
urldate = {2017-11-16},
journal = {Journal of Learning Analytics},
volume = {2},
number = {2},
pages = {75--101},
abstract = {Designing learning experiences that support the development of coherent understanding of complex scientific phenomena is challenging. We sought to identify analytics that can also guide such designs to support retention of coherent understanding. Based on prior research that distributing study of material over time supports retention, we explored revisiting previously studied material as an analytic. We tested ways to operationalize revisiting: as a general propensity to revisit previously studied material; as a propensity to revisit specific curricular steps; as a general propensity to distribute study by revisiting previously studied material on different days; and as a propensity to distribute study by revisiting specific steps on different days. The specific steps identified as central to the learning design included a static illustration and a dynamic visualization. We modelled revisiting in a sample of 664 students taught by seven different teachers using a Web-based Inquiry Science Environment unit. Analysis of log files and regression modelling revealed that a general propensity to revisit did not predict retention. Revisiting the dynamic visualization better supported retention than revisiting static material, but only for distributed revisiting. Our findings suggest that revisiting can be a useful analytic when aligned with the framework guiding learning design.},
keywords = {CLASS, GRIDS, PLANS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{DonnellyAutomatedGuidanceThermodynamics2015,
title = {Automated Guidance for Thermodynamics Essays: Critiquing Versus Revisiting},
author = {Dermot F Donnelly and Jonathan M Vitale and Marcia C Linn},
doi = {10.1007/s10956-015-9569-1},
issn = {1059-0145, 1573-1839},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
urldate = {2017-11-16},
journal = {Journal of Science Education and Technology},
volume = {24},
number = {6},
pages = {861--874},
keywords = {CLASS, GRIDS, VISUAL},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{LiuMeasuringKnowledgeIntegration2015,
title = {Measuring Knowledge Integration Learning of Energy Topics: A Two-Year Longitudinal Study},
author = {Ou Lydia Liu and Kihyun Ryoo and Marcia C Linn and Elissa Sato and Vanessa Svihla},
doi = {10.1080/09500693.2015.1016470},
issn = {0950-0693, 1464-5289},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
urldate = {2017-11-16},
journal = {International Journal of Science Education},
volume = {37},
number = {7},
pages = {1044--1066},
keywords = {CLASS, GRIDS, VISUAL},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{McElhaneyEvidenceeffectiveuses2015,
title = {Evidence for Effective Uses of Dynamic Visualisations in Science Curriculum Materials},
author = {Kevin W McElhaney and Hsin-Yi Chang and Jennifer L Chiu and Marcia C Linn},
doi = {10.1080/03057267.2014.984506},
issn = {0305-7267, 1940-8412},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
urldate = {2017-11-16},
journal = {Studies in Science Education},
volume = {51},
number = {1},
pages = {49--85},
keywords = {CLASS, GRIDS, VISUAL},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{RyooDesigningValidatingAssessments2015,
title = {Designing and Validating Assessments of Complex Thinking in Science},
author = {Kihyun Ryoo and Marcia C Linn},
doi = {10.1080/00405841.2015.1044374},
issn = {0040-5841, 1543-0421},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
urldate = {2017-11-16},
journal = {Theory Into Practice},
volume = {54},
number = {3},
pages = {238--254},
keywords = {CLASS, GRIDS, VISUAL},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{MillerWomenrepresentationscience2015,
title = {Women's Representation in Science Predicts National Gender-Science Stereotypes: Evidence from 66 Nations.},
author = {David I Miller and Alice H Eagly and Marcia C Linn},
doi = {10.1037/edu0000005},
issn = {1939-2176, 0022-0663},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
urldate = {2017-11-16},
journal = {Journal of Educational Psychology},
volume = {107},
number = {3},
pages = {631--644},
keywords = {CLASS, VISUAL},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@incollection{ClarkIntegratingflexiblelanguage2015,
title = {Integrating Flexible Language Supports within Online Science Learning Environments},
author = {Douglas B Clark and Brian Nelson and Robert Atkinson and Frank Ramirez-Marin and William Medina-Jerez},
editor = {Tirupalavanam G Ganesh and Anna W Boriack and Jacqueline R Stillsano and Trina J Davis and Hersch C Waxman},
isbn = {978-1-62396-825-0 978-1-62396-826-7},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
booktitle = {Research on Technology Use in Multicultural Settings},
pages = {75--106},
publisher = {Information Age Publishing, Inc},
address = {Charlotte, NC},
keywords = {CLEAR},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {incollection}
}

@article{DonnellyImpactsCharacteristicsComputerBased2014,
title = {Impacts and Characteristics of Computer-Based Science Inquiry Learning Environments for Precollege Students},
author = {D F Donnelly and M C Linn and S Ludvigsen},
doi = {10.3102/0034654314546954},
issn = {0034-6543, 1935-1046},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-12-01},
urldate = {2017-11-16},
journal = {Review of Educational Research},
volume = {84},
number = {4},
pages = {572--608},
keywords = {CLASS, CLEAR, VISUAL},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{LiuAutomatedScoringConstructedResponse2014,
title = {Automated Scoring of Constructed-Response Science Items: Prospects and Obstacles},
author = {Ou Lydia Liu and Chris Brew and John Blackmore and Libby Gerard and Jacquie Madhok and Marcia C Linn},
doi = {10.1111/emip.12028},
issn = {07311745},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-06-01},
urldate = {2017-11-16},
journal = {Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice},
volume = {33},
number = {2},
pages = {19--28},
keywords = {CLASS, CLEAR, VISUAL},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{RyooDesigningguidanceinterpreting2014,
title = {Designing Guidance for Interpreting Dynamic Visualizations: Generating versus Reading Explanations: GUIDANCE FOR INTERPRETING DYNAMIC VISUALIZATIONS},
author = {Kihyun Ryoo and Marcia C Linn},
doi = {10.1002/tea.21128},
issn = {00224308},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-02-01},
urldate = {2017-11-16},
journal = {Journal of Research in Science Teaching},
volume = {51},
number = {2},
pages = {147--174},
keywords = {CLASS, CLEAR, VISUAL},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{ChiuSupportingKnowledgeIntegration2014,
title = {Supporting Knowledge Integration in Chemistry with a Visualization-Enhanced Inquiry Unit},
author = {Jennifer L Chiu and Marcia C Linn},
doi = {10.1007/s10956-013-9449-5},
issn = {1059-0145, 1573-1839},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-02-01},
urldate = {2017-11-16},
journal = {Journal of Science Education and Technology},
volume = {23},
number = {1},
pages = {37--58},
keywords = {CLASS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{LinnComputerGuidedInquiryImprove2014,
title = {Computer-Guided Inquiry to Improve Science Learning},
author = {M C Linn and L Gerard and K Ryoo and K McElhaney and O L Liu and A N Rafferty},
doi = {10.1126/science.1245980},
issn = {0036-8075, 1095-9203},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-01-01},
urldate = {2017-11-16},
journal = {Science},
volume = {344},
number = {6180},
pages = {155--156},
keywords = {CLASS, CLEAR},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{VitaleApplyinggroundedcoordination2014,
title = {Applying Grounded Coordination Challenges to Concrete Learning Materials: A Study of Number Line Estimation.},
author = {Jonathan M Vitale and John B Black and Michael I Swart},
doi = {10.1037/a0034098},
issn = {1939-2176, 0022-0663},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-01-01},
urldate = {2017-11-16},
journal = {Journal of Educational Psychology},
volume = {106},
number = {2},
pages = {403--418},
keywords = {CLASS, VISUAL},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{DonnellyEnhancingStudentExperiment2013,
title = {Enhancing the Student Experiment Experience: Visible Scientific Inquiry Through a Virtual Chemistry Laboratory},
author = {Dermot Donnelly and John O'Reilly and Oliver McGarr},
doi = {10.1007/s11165-012-9322-1},
issn = {0157-244X, 1573-1898},
year = {2013},
date = {2013-08-01},
urldate = {2017-11-17},
journal = {Research in Science Education},
volume = {43},
number = {4},
pages = {1571--1592},
abstract = {Practical work is often noted as a core reason many students take on science in secondary schools (high schools). However, there are inherent difficulties associated with classroom practical work that militate against scientific inquiry, an approach espoused by many science educators. The use of interactive simulations to facilitate student inquiry has emerged as a complement to practical work. This study presents case studies of four science teachers using a virtual chemistry laboratory (VCL) with their students in an explicitly guided inquiry manner. Research tools included the use of the Inquiry Science Implementation Scale in a `talk-aloud' manner, Reformed Teaching Observation Protocol for video observations, and teacher interviews. The findings suggest key aspects of practical work that hinder teachers in adequately supporting inquiry and highlight where a VCL can overcome many of these difficulties. The findings also indicate considerations in using the VCL in its own right.},
keywords = {CLASS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@incollection{ClarkKnowledgeIntegrationPerspective2013,
title = {The Knowledge Integration Perspective: Connections Across Research and Education},
author = {Douglas B Clark and Marcia C Linn},
editor = {Stella Vosniadou},
isbn = {978-0-415-89883-6},
year = {2013},
date = {2013-06-01},
booktitle = {International Handbook of Research on Conceptual Change},
pages = {520--538},
publisher = {Routledge},
address = {New York},
edition = {2 edition},
keywords = {MODELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {incollection}
}

@article{deJongPhysicalVirtualLaboratories2013,
title = {Physical and Virtual Laboratories in Science and Engineering Education},
author = {Ton {de Jong} and Marcia C Linn and Zacharias C Zacharia},
doi = {10.1126/science.1230579},
issn = {0036-8075, 1095-9203},
year = {2013},
date = {2013-04-01},
urldate = {2017-11-18},
journal = {Science},
volume = {340},
number = {6130},
pages = {305--308},
abstract = {The world needs young people who are skillful in and enthusiastic about science and who view science as their future career field. Ensuring that we will have such young people requires initiatives that engage students in interesting and motivating science experiences. Today, students can investigate scientific phenomena using the tools, data collection techniques, models, and theories of science in physical laboratories that support interactions with the material world or in virtual laboratories that take advantage of simulations. Here, we review a selection of the literature to contrast the value of physical and virtual investigations and to offer recommendations for combining the two to strengthen science learning.},
keywords = {CLASS, CLEAR, VISUAL},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{ChangScaffoldinglearningmolecular2013,
title = {Scaffolding Learning from Molecular Visualizations: SCAFFOLDING MOLECULAR VISUALIZATIONS},
author = {Hsin-Yi Chang and Marcia C Linn},
doi = {10.1002/tea.21089},
issn = {00224308},
year = {2013},
date = {2013-01-01},
urldate = {2017-11-16},
journal = {Journal of Research in Science Teaching},
volume = {50},
number = {7},
pages = {858--886},
keywords = {CLASS, CLEAR, VISUAL},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{DonnellyConsumingcreatingEarlyadopting2013,
title = {Consuming and Creating: Early-Adopting Science Teachers' Perceptions and Use of a Wiki to Support Professional Development - ScienceDirect},
author = {D F Donnelly and S Boniface},
year = {2013},
date = {2013-01-01},
urldate = {2017-11-17},
journal = {Computers & Education},
volume = {68},
pages = {9},
keywords = {CLASS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@incollection{LinnEnablingParticipantsOnline2012,
title = {Enabling Participants in Online Forums to Learn from Each Other},
author = {M C Linn and J D Slotta},
editor = {Angela M O'Donnell and Cindy E Hmelo-Silver and Gijsbert Erkens},
isbn = {978-0-415-64893-6},
year = {2012},
date = {2012-11-01},
booktitle = {Collaborative Learning, Reasoning, and Technology},
publisher = {Routledge},
address = {New York},
edition = {1 edition},
keywords = {MODELS, TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {incollection}
}

@article{VarmaUsingInteractiveTechnology2012,
title = {Using Interactive Technology to Support Students' Understanding of the Greenhouse Effect and Global Warming},
author = {Keisha Varma and Marcia C Linn},
doi = {10.1007/s10956-011-9337-9},
issn = {1059-0145, 1573-1839},
year = {2012},
date = {2012-08-01},
urldate = {2017-11-19},
journal = {Journal of Science Education and Technology},
volume = {21},
number = {4},
pages = {453--464},
keywords = {CLEAR, VISUAL},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{ClarkBilingualLanguageSupports2012,
title = {Bilingual Language Supports in Online Science Inquiry Environments},
author = {Douglas B Clark and Stephanie Touchman and Mario Martinez-Garza and Frank Ramirez-Marin and Tina Skjerping Drews},
doi = {10.1016/j.compedu.2011.11.019},
issn = {0360-1315},
year = {2012},
date = {2012-05-01},
urldate = {2017-11-18},
journal = {Computers & Education},
volume = {58},
number = {4},
pages = {1207--1224},
abstract = {Research over the past fifteen years has investigated and developed online science inquiry environments to support students engaging in authentic scientific inquiry practices. This research has focused on developing activity structures and tools to scaffold students in engaging in different aspects of these practices, but relatively little of this research has explored linguistic supports for language minority students studying science in their non-native language. These students are simultaneously learning science and the surrounding academic language in their second language. This study investigates the potential value of providing 8th grade Spanish-speaking English language learners access to content and supports in both English and Spanish as opposed to an English-only format in an online science inquiry environment. Learning outcomes are compared between the two conditions on an immediate post-test in English, a delayed post-test in English, a delayed post-test in Spanish, and a written essay in English in the form of a letter to the governor. The outcomes suggest significant benefits for providing ELL students with access to content and supports in both English and Spanish as opposed to the English-only format. The findings of this study carry important policy implications in light of the growing English-only political movements in the United States and similar political movements in other countries. (Contains 3 tables and 9 figures.)},
keywords = {CLEAR, VISUAL},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@incollection{LinnInsightsTeachingLearning2012,
title = {Insights for Teaching and Learning Science},
author = {M C Linn},
editor = {Chris Dede and John Richards},
isbn = {978-0-8077-5316-3},
year = {2012},
date = {2012-04-01},
booktitle = {Digital Teaching Platforms: Customizing Classroom Learning for Each Student},
pages = {55--70},
publisher = {Teachers College Press},
address = {New York},
keywords = {CLASS, CLEAR},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {incollection}
}

@incollection{McElhaneyOrchestratingInquiryInstruction2012,
title = {Orchestrating Inquiry Instruction Using the Knowledge Integration Framework},
author = {K W McElhaney and M C Linn},
editor = {Karen Littleton and Eileen Scanlon and Mike Sharples},
year = {2012},
date = {2012-03-01},
booktitle = {Orchestrating Inquiry Learning},
pages = {48--68},
publisher = {Routledge},
edition = {1 edition},
keywords = {CLASS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {incollection}
}

@article{SvihlaDesignbasedApproachFostering2012,
title = {A Design-Based Approach to Fostering Understanding of Global Climate Change},
author = {Vanessa Svihla and Marcia C Linn},
doi = {10.1080/09500693.2011.597453},
issn = {0950-0693, 1464-5289},
year = {2012},
date = {2012-03-01},
urldate = {2017-11-19},
journal = {International Journal of Science Education},
volume = {34},
number = {5},
pages = {651--676},
keywords = {CLEAR},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{RyooCandynamicvisualizations2012,
title = {Can Dynamic Visualizations Improve Middle School Students' Understanding of Energy in Photosynthesis?},
author = {Kihyun Ryoo and Marcia C Linn},
doi = {10.1002/tea.21003},
issn = {00224308},
year = {2012},
date = {2012-02-01},
urldate = {2017-11-19},
journal = {Journal of Research in Science Teaching},
volume = {49},
number = {2},
pages = {218--243},
keywords = {CLEAR, VISUAL},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{LinnOpenSourceOnlineScience2012,
title = {Open-Source Online Science Inquiry Materials: Building a Community},
author = {M C Linn and Libby F Gerard and M E Sato},
year = {2012},
date = {2012-01-01},
journal = {Revista Contrapontos},
volume = {12},
pages = {7},
keywords = {CLASS, CLEAR, VISUAL},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{ZertucheHowopenerscontribute2012,
title = {How Do Openers Contribute to Student Learning? | International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education},
author = {Amber Zertuche and Libby Gerard and Marcia C Linn},
year = {2012},
date = {2012-01-01},
urldate = {2017-11-17},
journal = {International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education},
volume = {5},
number = {1},
pages = {79--92},
keywords = {CLASS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@incollection{ChiuRoleSelfmonitoringLearning2012,
title = {The Role of Self-Monitoring in Learning Chemistry with Dynamic Visualizations},
author = {Jennifer L Chiu and Marcia C Linn},
isbn = {978-94-007-2131-9 978-94-007-2132-6},
year = {2012},
date = {2012-01-01},
urldate = {2017-11-18},
booktitle = {Metacognition in Science Education},
pages = {133--163},
publisher = {Springer, Dordrecht},
abstract = {This chapter explores ways to help students monitor and regulate their learning of difficult chemistry concepts. Dynamic visualizations can illustrate complex, unobservable phenomena such as bond breaking and bond formation. To develop robust, integrated understanding when learning with visualizations, students need cognitive understanding of the phenomena as represented in the visualization. They also need metacognitive skills to decide whether they understand the visualization and determine when to revisit the visualization to clarify their interpretations. We investigate the development of integrated understanding using the Technology-Enhanced Learning in Science (TELS) chemical reactions inquiry unit that combines the pedagogical support of the Web-based Inquiry Science Environment (WISE) with dynamic visualizations from Molecular Workbench. Our first study combining judgments of learning and explanation prompts revealed that visualizations may fail to add new ideas because they are often deceptively clear. Students typically overestimated their understanding of visualizations while gaining only superficial ideas. In our second study we refined both cognitive and metacognitive guidance to encourage students to distinguish and reflect upon their ideas. The results suggest that strengthening self-monitoring skills can overcome deceptive clarity and lead to coherent understanding. These studies suggest that the metacognitive skills of monitoring understanding of complex visualizations and determining when to return to the visualization contribute to the development of integrated understanding and can be supported by careful design of technology-enhanced instruction. The notion of metacognition applied in this study refers to monitoring and evaluating one's understanding, to the regulation/control function of metacognition, and to the self-knowledge functions of metacognition.},
keywords = {CLASS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {incollection}
}

@incollection{ChiuRoleSelfMonitoringLearning2012b,
title = {The Role of Self-Monitoring in Learning Chemistry with Dynamic Visualization},
author = {Jennifer L Chiu and Marcia C Linn},
editor = {Anat Zohar and Yehudit Judy Dori},
isbn = {978-94-007-2132-6 978-94-007-2131-9},
year = {2012},
date = {2012-01-01},
urldate = {2017-11-19},
booktitle = {Metacognition in Science Education Trends in Current Research},
pages = {133--163},
publisher = {Springer Science +Business Media B.V.},
address = {Dordrecht},
abstract = {OCLC: 929293681},
keywords = {CLEAR},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {incollection}
}

@article{TissenbaumCoDesigningCollaborativeSmart2012,
title = {Co-Designing Collaborative Smart Classroom Curriculum for Secondary School Science},
author = {Mike Tissenbaum and Michelle Liu and James. D Slotta},
year = {2012},
date = {2012-01-01},
journal = {Journal of Universal Computer Science},
volume = {18},
number = {3},
pages = {327--352},
abstract = {This paper introduces a series of iterative designs that investigate how the aggregation and visualization of student-contributed work can support collaborative problem solving in the domain of physics. We investigate how new technologies can enable students to contribute to a shared knowledge base, working across contexts: in class, at home, and in a specialized "smart classroom" environment. We explore how student data can be provided to the teacher before class, in support of planning the next day's lesson, and during class, to help the teacher orchestrate class activities and respond to student needs. Our work builds upon the research tradition of knowledge communities and inquiry learning to inform its design of materials and activities that support productive collaborative interactions for learners. We are also guided by the recent literature on scripting and orchestration to define curricular activities that bridge home and school environments, leveraging a digital platform that includes Web 2.0 features to guide structured collaborations. This paper reports on a design-based research program in which the development of the curriculum and technology platform is informed by successive cycles of design, enactment, analysis, and re-design. The paper will review our efforts through three successive design cycles, exploring the evolution of our own "smart classroom curriculum" for high school physics. For each iteration, we present our design goals, the resulting curriculum and technology, the student learning outcomes, and our evaluation that informs the next iteration. We end with a description of our current design, and discuss the goals and directions of our future efforts.},
keywords = {VISUAL},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{ChenVisualizingEarthExplaining2012,
title = {Visualizing Earth and Explaining Seasons},
author = {Jennifer King Chen and Stephen Bannasch and Cynthia McIntyre},
year = {2012},
date = {2012-01-01},
urldate = {2017-11-18},
journal = {@Concord},
volume = {16},
pages = {12--13},
abstract = {The first person to walk on the surface of the moon, Neil Armstrong viewed our planet as a floating globe in space. He is one of only a dozen who have had the opportunity to view Earth from its orbiting satellite. Photographs from Apollo 11 (Figure 1) give a glimpse of that experience, but what's it},
keywords = {VISUAL},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{ZhangCangeneratingrepresentations2011,
title = {Can Generating Representations Enhance Learning with Dynamic Visualizations?},
author = {Zhihui Helen Zhang and Marcia C Linn},
doi = {10.1002/tea.20443},
issn = {00224308},
year = {2011},
date = {2011-12-01},
urldate = {2017-11-19},
journal = {Journal of Research in Science Teaching},
volume = {48},
number = {10},
pages = {1177--1198},
keywords = {CLEAR, VISUAL},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{LiuInvestigationExplanationMultipleChoice2011,
title = {An Investigation of Explanation Multiple-Choice Items in Science Assessment},
author = {Ou Lydia Liu and Hee-Sun Lee and Marcia C Linn},
doi = {10.1080/10627197.2011.611702},
issn = {1062-7197},
year = {2011},
date = {2011-09-01},
urldate = {2017-11-18},
journal = {Educational Assessment},
volume = {16},
number = {3},
pages = {164--184},
abstract = {Both multiple-choice and constructed-response items have known advantages and disadvantages in measuring scientific inquiry. In this article we explore the function of explanation multiple-choice (EMC) items and examine how EMC items differ from traditional multiple-choice and constructed-response items in measuring scientific reasoning. A group of 794 middle school students was randomly assigned to answer either constructed-response or EMC items following regular multiple-choice items. By applying a Rasch partial-credit analysis, we found that there is a consistent alignment between the EMC and multiple-choice items. Also, the EMC items are easier than the constructed-response items but are harder than most of the multiple-choice items. We discuss the potential value of the EMC items as a learning and diagnostic tool.},
keywords = {CLEAR, VISUAL},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{McElhaneyInvestigationscomplexrealistic2011,
title = {Investigations of a Complex, Realistic Task: Intentional, Unsystematic, and Exhaustive Experimenters},
author = {Kevin W McElhaney and Marcia C Linn},
doi = {10.1002/tea.20423},
issn = {1098-2736},
year = {2011},
date = {2011-09-01},
urldate = {2017-11-18},
journal = {Journal of Research in Science Teaching},
volume = {48},
number = {7},
pages = {745--770},
abstract = {This study examines how students' experimentation with a virtual environment contributes to their understanding of a complex, realistic inquiry problem. We designed a week-long, technology-enhanced inquiry unit on car collisions. The unit uses new technologies to log students' experimentation choices. Physics students (n,=,148) in six diverse high schools studied the unit and responded to pretests, posttests, and embedded assessments. We scored students' experimentation using four methods: total number of trials, variability of variable choices, propensity to vary one variable at a time, and coherence between investigation goals and experimentation methods. Students made moderate, significant overall pretest to posttest gains on physics understanding. Coherence was a strong predictor of learning, controlling for pretest scores and the other experimentation measures. We identify three categories of experimenters (intentional, unsystematic, and exhaustive) and illustrate these categories with examples. The findings suggest that students must combine disciplinary knowledge of the investigation with intentional investigation of the inquiry questions in order to understand the nature of the variables. Mechanically executing well-established experimentation procedures (such as varying one variable at a time or comprehensively exploring the experimentation space) is less likely to lead students to valuable insights about complex tasks. Our proposed categories extend and refine previous efforts to categorize experimenters by linking scientific procedures with understanding of the science discipline. textcopyright 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 48: 745–770, 2011},
keywords = {VISUAL},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{ShenTechnologyEnhancedUnit2011,
title = {A Technology-Enhanced Unit of Modeling Static Electricity: Integrating Scientific Explanations and Everyday Observations},
author = {Ji Shen and Marcia C Linn},
doi = {10.1080/09500693.2010.514012},
issn = {0950-0693},
year = {2011},
date = {2011-08-01},
urldate = {2017-11-19},
journal = {International Journal of Science Education},
volume = {33},
number = {12},
pages = {1597--1623},
abstract = {What trajectories do students follow as they connect their observations of electrostatic phenomena to atomic-level visualizations? We designed an electrostatics unit, using the knowledge integration framework to help students link observations and scientific ideas. We analyze how learners integrate ideas about charges, charged particles, energy, and observable events. We compare learning enactments in a typical school and a magnet school in the USA. We use pre-tests, post-tests, embedded notes, and delayed post-tests to capture the trajectories of students' knowledge integration. We analyze how visualizations help students grapple with abstract electrostatics concepts such as induction. We find that overall students gain more sophisticated ideas. They can interpret dynamic, interactive visualizations, and connect charge- and particle-based explanations to interpret observable events. Students continue to have difficulty in applying the energy-based explanation.},
keywords = {CLEAR, VISUAL},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{LinnOffshoringcriticalthinking2011,
title = {Off-Shoring Critical Thinking},
author = {Marcia C Linn},
year = {2011},
date = {2011-06-01},
urldate = {2017-11-18},
journal = {San Francisco Chronicle},
abstract = {Nations seeking to compete for well-paying jobs in research, development and manufacturing are now adding proven critical thinking activities developed in America to their science courses. While American teachers are cutting back on experimentation, leaders in China, Taiwan, Korea, Norway and other countries are clamoring to use activities such as those found in the online, open source Web-based Inquiry Science Environment unit developed at UC Berkeley ( www.wise.berkeley.edu). Rather than memorizing the parts of an atom, students could learn and apply ideas about atoms while studying a unit on hydrogen fuel-cell cars. Students could use visualizations of chemical reactions to investigate the trade-offs between gasoline-powered and hydrogen-fuel-cell-powered cars and buses. [...] students prefer investigating scientific visualizations to textbooks and report that visualizations allow them to see how science works and to test their ideas.},
keywords = {VISUAL},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{ChiuKnowledgeIntegrationWise2011,
title = {Knowledge Integration and Wise Engineering},
author = {Jennifer Chiu and M Linn},
doi = {10.7771/2157-9288.1026},
issn = {2157-9288},
year = {2011},
date = {2011-04-01},
journal = {Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER)},
volume = {1},
number = {1},
keywords = {CLEAR, MODELS, VISUAL},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@book{LinnScienceLearningInstruction2011,
title = {Science Learning and Instruction: Taking Advantage of Technology to Promote Knowledge Integration},
author = {Marcia C Linn and Bat-Sheva Eylon},
isbn = {978-0-8058-6054-2},
year = {2011},
date = {2011-04-01},
publisher = {Routledge},
address = {New York},
edition = {1 edition},
abstract = {Science Learning and Instruction describes advances in understanding the nature of science learning and their implications for the design of science instruction. The authors show how design patterns, design principles, and professional development opportunities coalesce to create and sustain effective instruction in each primary scientific domain: earth science, life science, and physical science. Calling for more in depth and less fleeting coverage of science topics in order to accomplish knowledge integration, the book highlights the importance of designing the instructional materials, the examples that are introduced in each scientific domain, and the professional development that accompanies these materials. It argues that unless all these efforts are made simultaneously, educators cannot hope to improve science learning outcomes. The book also addresses how many policies, including curriculum, standards, guidelines, and standardized tests, work against the goal of integrative understanding, and discusses opportunities to rethink science education policies based on research findings from instruction that emphasizes such understanding.},
keywords = {CLEAR},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {book}
}

@article{LeeValidatingMeasurementKnowledge2011,
title = {Validating Measurement of Knowledge Integration in Science Using Multiple-Choice and Explanation Items},
author = {Hee-Sun Lee and Ou Lydia Liu and Marcia C Linn},
issn = {0895-7347},
year = {2011},
date = {2011-01-01},
urldate = {2017-11-18},
journal = {Applied Measurement in Education},
volume = {24},
number = {2},
pages = {115--136},
abstract = {This study explores measurement of a construct called knowledge integration in science using multiple-choice and explanation items. We use construct and instructional validity evidence to examine the role multiple-choice and explanation items plays in measuring students' knowledge integration ability. For construct validity, we analyze item properties such as alignment, discrimination, and target range on the knowledge integration scale using a Rasch Partial Credit Model analysis. For instructional validity, we test the sensitivity of multiple-choice and explanation items to knowledge integration instruction using a cohort comparison design. Results show that (1) one third of correct multiple-choice responses are aligned with higher levels of knowledge integration while three quarters of incorrect multiple-choice responses are aligned with lower levels of knowledge integration, (2) explanation items discriminate between high and low knowledge integration ability students much more effectively than multiple-choice items, (3) explanation items measure a wider range of knowledge integration levels than multiple-choice items, and (4) explanation items are more sensitive to knowledge integration instruction than multiple-choice items. (Contains 3 tables and 4 figures.)},
keywords = {CLEAR, MODELS, VISUAL},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{SampsonComparisonCollaborativeScientific2011,
title = {A Comparison of the Collaborative Scientific Argumentation Practices of Two High and Two Low Performing Groups},
author = {Victor Sampson and Douglas B Clark},
doi = {10.1007/s11165-009-9146-9},
issn = {0157-244X, 1573-1898},
year = {2011},
date = {2011-01-01},
urldate = {2017-11-18},
journal = {Research in Science Education},
volume = {41},
number = {1},
pages = {63--97},
abstract = {This qualitative study examines the interactions between individuals, ideas, and materials as two high and two low performing groups of students engaged in a process of collaborative scientific argumentation. To engage students in collaborative scientific argumentation the students were randomly assigned to small groups of three students each. Each triad was asked to critique six alternative explanations for a discrepant event and to produce a single written argument justifying the explanation they felt was most valid or acceptable. The two higher performing triads produced arguments that included a sufficient and accurate explanation that was well supported with appropriate evidence and reasoning while the two lower performing triads produced arguments that included an inaccurate explanation supported by inappropriate justification. A verbal analysis of the interactive processes that took place within these four triads identified five distinct differences in the ways these triads engaged in collaborative scientific argumentation that seemed to promote or constrain the development of high quality written arguments. These differences include (1) the number of unique ideas introduced into the conversation, (2) how individuals responded to these ideas, (3) how often individuals challenged ideas when discussing them, (4) the criteria individuals used to distinguish between ideas, and (5) how group members used the available corpus of data. The conclusions and implications of this study include recommendations for the design and revision of curriculum, the development of new instructional models and technology-enhanced learning environments, and areas for future research.},
keywords = {CLEAR, VISUAL},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{KaliTeachingdesigneducational2011,
title = {Teaching to Design Educational Technologies},
author = {Yael Kali and Tamar Ronen-Fuhrmann},
doi = {10.1504/IJLT.2011.040147},
issn = {1477-8386},
year = {2011},
date = {2011-01-01},
urldate = {2017-11-18},
journal = {International Journal of Learning Technology},
volume = {6},
number = {1},
pages = {4--23},
abstract = {Finding ways to support novice educational technology designers is of high importance in many design fields. In this research we examined three courses in which graduate students learned to design technology-based curriculum modules. The courses were based on a teaching model developed in a design-based research methodology with four iterations. The model integrates the openness of a studio approach, with the structure of a well-known instructional systems-design process. It also takes advantage of experts' design knowledge embedded in a database of design principles. Qualitative data was used to evaluate the affordances and challenges of progressive versions of the teaching model. A generalised model for teaching educational technology design was derived, in which the following constructs are intertwined: astructuring the design processbbuilding on accessible repositories of expert design knowledgecenabling dialogic learning.},
keywords = {CLEAR, VISUAL},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{SvihlaConnectingEnergyCurriculum2011,
title = {Connecting Energy Across the Curriculum},
author = {Vanessa Svihla and K Ryoo and M C Linn and Chad Dorsey},
year = {2011},
date = {2011-01-01},
urldate = {2017-11-19},
journal = {@Concord},
volume = {15},
pages = {12--13},
abstract = {The importance of energy and energy use is evident in all corners of our lives. From the food we eat to the cars we drive, energy plays a central role in our political and social lives. Similarly, energy is one of the most central ideas in science. The flow and transformation of energy ties together},
keywords = {CLEAR},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@incollection{CorlissAssessinglearninginquiry2011,
title = {Assessing Learning from Inquiry Science Instruction},
author = {Stephanie B Corliss and Marcia C Linn},
editor = {Gregory J Schraw and Daniel H Robinson},
isbn = {978-1-61735-506-6 978-1-61735-505-9},
year = {2011},
date = {2011-01-01},
booktitle = {Assessment of Higher Order Thinking Skills},
pages = {219--244},
publisher = {Information Age Pub.},
address = {Charlotte, N.C.},
abstract = {OCLC: 727658516},
keywords = {CLEAR},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {incollection}
}

@incollection{PeledIntegratingsustainingtechnology2011,
title = {Integrating and Sustaining Technology in Instruction: A Longitudinal Study of the Teacher-Principal Perspective},
author = {Y Peled and Yehudit Judy Dori and Yael Kali},
editor = {D Chen and G Kurtz},
year = {2011},
date = {2011-01-01},
booktitle = {ICT, Learning and Teaching},
pages = {311--331},
keywords = {CLEAR},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {incollection}
}

@article{LinnCombiningLearningAssessment2011,
title = {Combining Learning and Assessment to Improve Science Education},
author = {Marcia C Linn and Jennifer Chiu},
issn = {2161-4210},
year = {2011},
date = {2011-01-01},
urldate = {2017-11-18},
journal = {Research & Practice in Assessment},
volume = {6},
pages = {5--14},
abstract = {High-stakes tests take time away from valuable learning activities, narrow the focus of instruction, and imply that science involves memorizing details rather than understanding the natural world. Current tests lead precollege instructors to postpone science inquiry activities until after the last standardized test is completed--often during the last week of school. Students spend countless hours practicing and taking multiple-choice tests that have little educational value. Learning tests that help students understand science and measure progress at the same time are needed. This article discusses the following topics regarding science education: (1) Learning Test Goals; (2) Teaching and Assessing Lifelong Learning; (3) Visualizations and Assessment; (4) Teaching and Assessing with Concept Maps; (5) Essay Questions, Learning, and Assessment; and (6) Improving Assessment in Lecture Classes. Valuable classroom time can be reclaimed by using online learning environments that incorporate learning tests to measure lifelong learning skills. Think about what would happen if scientists spent time memorizing new facts rather than investigating compelling problems. A focus on lifelong learning to the classroom needs to be restored to retain a competitive advantage in science.},
keywords = {VISUAL},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{GerardTeacheruseevidence2010,
title = {Teacher Use of Evidence to Customize Inquiry Science Instruction},
author = {Libby F Gerard and Michele Spitulnik and Marcia C Linn},
doi = {10.1002/tea.20367},
issn = {00224308},
year = {2010},
date = {2010-11-01},
urldate = {2017-11-19},
journal = {Journal of Research in Science Teaching},
volume = {47},
number = {9},
pages = {1037--1063},
keywords = {CLEAR, MODELS, VISUAL},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@incollection{LinnCandesirabledifficulties2010,
title = {Can Desirable Difficulties Overcome Deceptive Clarity in Scientific Visualizations?},
author = {Marcia C Linn and Hsin-Yi Chang and Jennifer L Chiu and Zhihui Helen Zhang and Kevin McElhaney},
editor = {Aaron S Benjamin},
isbn = {978-1-84872-891-2},
year = {2010},
date = {2010-11-01},
booktitle = {Successful Remembering and Successful Forgetting: A Festschrift in Honor of Robert A. Bjork},
pages = {235--258},
publisher = {Psychology Press},
address = {New York, NY},
edition = {1 edition},
keywords = {CLEAR},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {incollection}
}

@article{Liuinvestigationteacherimpact2010,
title = {An Investigation of Teacher Impact on Student Inquiry Science Performance Using a Hierarchical Linear Model},
author = {Ou Lydia Liu and Hee-Sun Lee and Marcia C Linn},
doi = {10.1002/tea.20372},
issn = {00224308},
year = {2010},
date = {2010-09-01},
urldate = {2017-11-19},
journal = {Journal of Research in Science Teaching},
volume = {47},
number = {7},
pages = {807--819},
keywords = {CLEAR, VISUAL},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@incollection{KaliCurriculumDesignSubject2010,
title = {Curriculum Design as Subject Matter: Science},
author = {Yael Kali and Marcia C Linn},
editor = {Penelope Peterson and Rob Tierney and Eva Baker and Barry McGaw},
isbn = {978-0-08-044893-0},
year = {2010},
date = {2010-06-01},
booktitle = {International Encyclopedia of Education, Third Edition},
pages = {468--474},
publisher = {Elsevier Science},
address = {Amsterdam},
edition = {3 edition},
keywords = {CLEAR, TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {incollection}
}

@article{LiuMultifacetedAssessmentInquiryBased2010,
title = {Multifaceted Assessment of Inquiry-Based Science Learning},
author = {Ou Lydia Liu and Hee-Sun Lee and Marcia C Linn},
doi = {10.1080/10627197.2010.491067},
issn = {1062-7197},
year = {2010},
date = {2010-05-01},
urldate = {2017-11-18},
journal = {Educational Assessment},
volume = {15},
number = {2},
pages = {69--86},
abstract = {To improve student science achievement in the United States we need inquiry-based instruction that promotes coherent understanding and assessments that are aligned with the instruction. Instead, current textbooks often offer fragmented ideas and most assessments only tap recall of details. In this study we implemented 10 inquiry-based science units that promote knowledge integration and developed assessments that measure student knowledge integration abilities. To measure student learning outcomes, we designed a science assessment consisting of both proximal items that are related to the units and distal items that are published from standardized tests (e.g., Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study). We compared the psychometric properties and instructional sensitivity of the proximal and distal items. To unveil the context of learning, we examined how student, class, and teacher characteristics affect student inquiry science learning. Several teacher-level characteristics including professional development showed a positive impact on science performance.},
keywords = {CLEAR, MODELS, TELS, VISUAL},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{LinnDesigningStandardsLifelong2010,
title = {Designing Standards for Lifelong Science Learning},
author = {Marcia Linn},
doi = {10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01047.x},
year = {2010},
date = {2010-04-01},
journal = {Journal of Engineering Education},
volume = {99},
abstract = {Science technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) standards should enable students to become lifelong learners who can make sense of new STEM-related dilemmas as they arise. We need citizens who can manage an unexpected health problem, make informed decisions about new energy sources, and interpret persuasive messages about topics such as online privacy, antidepressants, cloning, nanoscience, and earthquake safety. This might entail learning a new discipline, searching the Internet, interviewing experts, or distinguishing among conflicting sets of results. To develop STEM standards that promote lifelong science learning, partnerships between natural science and engineering offer great promise. The upcoming International Conference in the Learning Sciences (ICLS) convened by the International Society for the Learning Sciences (ISLS) can help build a community of researchers to tackle these problems. The only area where we have been able to control this proliferation is in the weight ofthe textbooks. Those concerned with stress injuries to children have succeeded in curtailing the weight of textbooks—for the moment. For example, in California, the following maximum weight standards are in effect for each student textbook in elementary and secondary school: textbullet Grades K-4: Three Pounds textbullet Grades 5-8: Four Pounds textbullet Grades 9—12: Five Pounds Of course, as states replace textbooks wath electronic materials even these minor constraints vvdU disappear. Publishers are already putting textbooks on electronic page turning devices—neglecting all the potential of more powerflil computers. Distressingly, efforts to pack tbe curriculum with more topics just deter students from participating in STEM courses and careers. Tbe stuffed curriculum offers students no chance to develop integrated, usenil understanding that they can build throughout their lives. To become lifelong learners, students need to use the science they learn to grapple with problems that they care about— starting with their first science class.},
keywords = {CLEAR, MODELS, TELS, VISUAL},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{ShenGettingHereThere2010,
title = {Getting from Here to There: The Roles of Policy Makers and Principals in Increasing Science Teacher Quality},
author = {Ji Shen and Libby Gerard and Jane Bowyer},
doi = {10.1007/s10972-009-9180-5},
issn = {1046-560X, 1573-1847},
year = {2010},
date = {2010-04-01},
urldate = {2017-11-18},
journal = {Journal of Science Teacher Education},
volume = {21},
number = {3},
pages = {283--307},
abstract = {In this study we investigate how federal and state policy makers, and school principals are working to improve science teacher quality. Interviews, focused discussions, and policy documents serve as the primary data source. Findings suggest that both policy makers and principals prioritize increasing incentives for teachers entering the science teaching profession, providing professional development for new teachers, and using students' data to evaluate and improve instruction. Differences between the two leadership groups emerged in terms of the grain size and practicality of their concerns. Our findings indicate that the complexity of educational challenges to improve science teacher quality call for the co-construction of policy by multiple constituent groups including school principals, federal and state policy makers, and science education researchers.},
keywords = {CLEAR, MODELS, TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{ErmelingTracingeffectsteacher2010,
title = {Tracing the Effects of Teacher Inquiry on Classroom Practice},
author = {Bradley A Ermeling},
doi = {10.1016/j.tate.2009.02.019},
issn = {0742-051X},
year = {2010},
date = {2010-04-01},
urldate = {2017-11-18},
journal = {Teaching and Teacher Education},
volume = {26},
number = {3},
pages = {377--388},
abstract = {Videotape and participant observation were used to document an American high school teacher workgroup's experience with collaborative teacher inquiry and to monitor changes in practice through two cycles of instructional planning, classroom implementation, and reflective analysis. Detectable changes in practice were observed, including a substantial improvement for two of the four teachers in fidelity of implementation of an instructional innovation. Results support claim that meaningful instructional changes are more likely when teachers work in job-alike teams, are led by trained leaders, use inquiry-focused protocols, and have stable settings in which to engage in the continuous improvement of instruction.},
keywords = {VISUAL},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{ShenNurturingStudentsCritical2010,
title = {Nurturing Students' Critical Knowledge Using Technology-Enhanced Scaffolding Strategies in Science Education},
author = {Ji Shen},
doi = {10.1007/s10956-009-9183-1},
issn = {1059-0145, 1573-1839},
year = {2010},
date = {2010-02-01},
urldate = {2017-11-20},
journal = {Journal of Science Education and Technology},
volume = {19},
number = {1},
pages = {1--12},
abstract = {Critique is central to the development of scientific knowledge. From a cognitive perspective, critique can be used to enhance understanding. From a social perspective, critique serves to maintain the standards of a professional field. In science education, it is of tremendous value to diagnose and nurture students' critical knowledge. How students develop and apply criteria for critique, however, remains unclear. What factors influence students' performance of critique, and how can educators incorporate technology-enhanced scaffolding strategies to help diagnose and nurture students' critical knowledge? In this paper, I define critical knowledge as the criteria people use to evaluate other knowledge, the ability to use these criteria across contexts, and the reflective understanding of such processes. Building on existing literature, I develop a conceptual framework that describes the components and processes involved in a critique activity. Using this framework, I discuss the application of technology-enhanced scaffolding strategies to facilitate critique activities in science classrooms.},
keywords = {TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{LiuEvaluatinginquirybasedscience2010,
title = {Evaluating Inquiry-Based Science Units Using a Hierarchical Linear Model},
author = {O L Liu and Hee-Sun Lee and M C Linn},
year = {2010},
date = {2010-01-01},
journal = {Educational Assessment},
volume = {15},
pages = {69--86},
keywords = {CLEAR, VISUAL},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{LindbergNewtrendsgender2010,
title = {New Trends in Gender and Mathematics Performance: A Meta-Analysis},
author = {S M Lindberg and Janet Shibley Hyde and J L Peterson and M C Linn},
year = {2010},
date = {2010-01-01},
journal = {Psychological Bulletin},
volume = {136},
number = {6},
pages = {1123--1135},
abstract = {In this article, we use meta-analysis to analyze gender differences in recent studies of mathematics performance. First, we meta-analyzed data from 242 studies published between 1990 and 2007, representing the testing of 1,286,350 people. Overall},
keywords = {CLEAR, VISUAL},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{GerardHowDoesCommunity2010,
title = {How Does a Community of Principals Develop Leadership for Technology-Enhanced Science?},
author = {Libby F Gerard and J B Bowyer and M C Linn},
year = {2010},
date = {2010-01-01},
journal = {Journal of School Leadership},
volume = {20},
pages = {145--183},
keywords = {CLEAR, VISUAL},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{Else-QuestCrossnationalpatternsgender2010,
title = {Cross-National Patterns of Gender Differences in Mathematics: A Meta-Analysis},
author = {Nicole M Else-Quest and Janet Shibley Hyde and Marcia C Linn},
doi = {10.1037/a0018053},
issn = {1939-1455},
year = {2010},
date = {2010-01-01},
journal = {Psychological Bulletin},
volume = {136},
number = {1},
pages = {103--127},
abstract = {A gender gap in mathematics achievement persists in some nations but not in others. In light of the underrepresentation of women in careers in science, technology, mathematics, and engineering, increasing research attention is being devoted to understanding gender differences in mathematics achievement, attitudes, and affect. The gender stratification hypothesis maintains that such gender differences are closely related to cultural variations in opportunity structures for girls and women. We meta-analyzed 2 major international data sets, the 2003 Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study and the Programme for International Student Assessment, representing 493,495 students 14-16 years of age, to estimate the magnitude of gender differences in mathematics achievement, attitudes, and affect across 69 nations throughout the world. Consistent with the gender similarities hypothesis, all of the mean effect sizes in mathematics achievement were very small (d $<$ 0.15); however, national effect sizes showed considerable variability (ds = -0.42 to 0.40). Despite gender similarities in achievement, boys reported more positive math attitudes and affect (ds = 0.10 to 0.33); national effect sizes ranged from d = -0.61 to 0.89. In contrast to those of previous tests of the gender stratification hypothesis, our results point to specific domains of gender equity responsible for gender gaps in math. Gender equity in school enrollment, women's share of research jobs, and women's parliamentary representation were the most powerful predictors of cross-national variability in gender gaps in math. Results are situated within the context of existing research demonstrating apparently paradoxical effects of societal gender equity and highlight the significance of increasing girls' and women's agency cross-nationally.},
keywords = {CLEAR, MODELS, VISUAL},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{LeeHowtechnologyenhancedinquiry2010,
title = {How Do Technology-Enhanced Inquiry Science Units Impact Classroom Learning?},
author = {Hee-Sun Lee and Marcia C Linn and Keisha Varma and Ou Lydia Liu},
doi = {10.1002/tea.20304},
issn = {00224308, 10982736},
year = {2010},
date = {2010-01-01},
urldate = {2017-11-19},
journal = {Journal of Research in Science Teaching},
volume = {47},
number = {1},
pages = {71--90},
keywords = {CLEAR, MODELS, TELS, VISUAL},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@incollection{PetersScaffoldingKnowledgeCommunities2010,
title = {Scaffolding Knowledge Communities in the Classroom: New Opportunities in the Web 2.0 Era},
author = {Vanessa L Peters and James. D Slotta},
editor = {Michael Jacobson and Peter Reimann},
year = {2010},
date = {2010-01-01},
urldate = {2017-11-19},
booktitle = {Designs for Learning Environments of the Future},
pages = {205--232},
publisher = {Springer-Verlag},
address = {New York},
keywords = {CLEAR, TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {incollection}
}

@incollection{SlottaEvolvingclassroomsfuture2010,
title = {Evolving the Classrooms of the Future: The Interplay of Pedagogy, Technology and Community},
author = {J D Slotta},
editor = {Kati Mäkitalo-Siegl and Jan Zottman and Frederic Kaplan and Frank Fischer},
isbn = {978-94-6091-103-3 978-94-6091-102-6},
year = {2010},
date = {2010-01-01},
booktitle = {Classroom of the Future: Orchestrating Collaborative Spaces},
pages = {215--242},
publisher = {Sense},
address = {Rotterdam ; Boston},
abstract = {OCLC: ocn526097822},
keywords = {CLEAR},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {incollection}
}

@article{Changimpactdesigningevaluating2010,
title = {The Impact of Designing and Evaluating Molecular Animations on How Well Middle School Students Understand the Particulate Nature of Matter},
author = {Hsin-Yi Chang and Chris Quintana and Joseph S Krajcik},
doi = {10.1002/sce.20352},
issn = {1098-237X},
year = {2010},
date = {2010-01-01},
urldate = {2017-11-19},
journal = {Science Education},
volume = {94},
number = {1},
pages = {73--94},
abstract = {In this study, we investigated whether the understanding of the particulate nature of matter by students was improved by allowing them to design and evaluate molecular animations of chemical phenomena. We developed Chemation, a learner-centered animation tool, to allow seventh-grade students to construct flipbook-like simple animations to show molecular models and dynamic processes. Eight classes comprising 271 students were randomly assigned to three treatments in which students used Chemation to (1) design, interpret, and evaluate animations, (2) only design and interpret animations, or (3) only view and interpret teacher-made animations. We employed 2-factor analysis of covariance and calculated effect sizes to examine the impact of the three treatments on student posttest performances and on student-generated animations and interpretations during class. We used the pretest data as a covariate to reduce a potential bias related to students' prior knowledge on their learning outcomes. The results indicate that designing animations coupled with peer evaluation is effective at improving student learning with instructional animation. On the other hand, the efficacy of allowing students to only design animations without peer evaluation is questionable compared with allowing students to view animations. textcopyright 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Sci Ed94:73–94, 2010},
keywords = {CLEAR},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{GerardprincipalcommunityBuilding2010,
title = {A Principal Community: Building School Leadership for Technology-Enhanced Science Curriculum Reform},
author = {Libby F Gerard and J B Bowyer and M C Linn},
year = {2010},
date = {2010-01-01},
journal = {Journal of School Leadership},
volume = {20},
pages = {145--183},
keywords = {MODELS, VISUAL},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{LeeAssessinglearningprogression2009,
title = {Assessing Learning Progression of Energy Concepts across Middle School Grades: The Knowledge Integration Perspective},
author = {Hee-Sun Lee and Ou Lydia Liu},
doi = {10.1002/sce.20382},
issn = {00368326, 1098237X},
year = {2009},
date = {2009-11-01},
urldate = {2017-11-19},
journal = {Science Education},
volume = {94},
number = {4},
pages = {665--688},
keywords = {CLEAR, TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{NewcombePsychologyrolemathematics2009,
title = {Psychology's Role in Mathematics and Science Education},
author = {Nora S Newcombe and Nalini Ambady and Jacquelynne Eccles and Louis Gomez and David Klahr and Marcia Linn and Kevin Miller and Kelly Mix},
doi = {10.1037/a0014813},
issn = {1935-990X},
year = {2009},
date = {2009-09-01},
journal = {The American Psychologist},
volume = {64},
number = {6},
pages = {538--550},
abstract = {Improving mathematics and science education in the United States has been a matter of national concern for over half a century. Psychology has a vital role to play in this enterprise. In this article, the authors review the kinds of contributions that psychology can make in four areas: (a) early understanding of mathematics, (b) understanding of science, (c) social and motivational aspects of involvement in mathematics and science, and (d) assessment of learning in mathematics and science. They also examine challenges to psychology's playing a central and constructive role and make recommendations for overcoming those challenges.},
keywords = {CLEAR, MODELS, TELS, VISUAL},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@book{Sisk-HiltonTeachingLearningPublic2009,
title = {Teaching and Learning in Public: Professional Development Through Shared Inquiry},
author = {Stephanie Sisk-Hilton},
isbn = {978-0-8077-5010-0},
year = {2009},
date = {2009-09-01},
publisher = {Teachers College Press},
address = {New York},
abstract = {This is the inspiring story of a group of teachers who used new technologies to document, analyze, and share an inquiry learning process together. This exciting new professional development model brings together the strengths and benefits of several existing approaches: participant-directed inquiry, school/university partnerships, and the shared pedagogical improvement model of lesson study. Based on the work of public school science teachers over the course of 3 years, it was developed to assist teachers in the daunting task of learning in public. How can an inquiry into teaching practice help teachers to support inquiry learning with their students? This book is an essential read for professional developers, teacher leaders, and school administrators.},
keywords = {CLEAR, TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {book}
}

@article{Kaliroledesignprinciplesdesigning2009,
title = {The Role of Design-Principles in Designing Courses That Promote Collaborative Learning in Higher-Education},
author = {Yael Kali and Rachel Levin-Peled and Yehudit Judy Dori},
doi = {10.1016/j.chb.2009.01.006},
issn = {0747-5632},
year = {2009},
date = {2009-09-01},
urldate = {2017-11-20},
journal = {Computers in Human Behavior},
volume = {25},
number = {5},
pages = {1067--1078},
abstract = {Design-patterns and design-principles represent two approaches, which elicit design knowledge from successful learning environments and formulate it as design guidelines. The two approaches are fairly similar in their strategies, but differ in their research origins. This study stems from the design-principles approach, and explores how learning is affected by curriculum-materials designed according to two main design-principles: (a) engage learners in peer instruction, and (b) reuse student artifacts as resource for further learning. These principles were employed in three higher-education courses and examined with 385 students. Data analysis was conducted in two trajectories: In the ``bird's eye view'' trajectory we used a ``feature'' unit of analysis to illustrate how learning was supported by features designed according to the two design-principles in each of the courses. In the ``design-based research'' trajectory we focused on one feature, a web-based Jigsaw activity, in a philosophy of education course, and demonstrated how it was refined via three design iterations. Students were required to specialize in one of three philosophical perspectives, share knowledge with peers who specialized in other perspectives, and reuse the shared knowledge in new contexts. Outcomes indicated that the design in the first iteration did not sufficiently support student ability to apply the shared knowledge. Two additional design-principles were employed in the next iterations: (c) provide knowledge representation and organization tools, and (d) employ multiple social-activity structures. The importance of combining several design-principles for designing curricular materials is discussed in terms of Alexander's design-pattern language and his notion of referencing between design-patterns.},
keywords = {TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{ClarkInitialStructuringOnline2009,
title = {Initial Structuring of Online Discussions to Improve Learning and Argumentation: Incorporating Students' Own Explanations as Seed Comments Versus an Augmented-Preset Approach to Seeding Discussions},
author = {Douglas B Clark and Cynthia M D'Angelo and Muhsin Menekse},
doi = {10.1007/s10956-009-9159-1},
issn = {1059-0145, 1573-1839},
year = {2009},
date = {2009-08-01},
urldate = {2017-11-19},
journal = {Journal of Science Education and Technology},
volume = {18},
number = {4},
pages = {321--333},
abstract = {Collaboration scripts can facilitate argumentation in online settings by grouping students with other students who have expressed differing perspectives on a discussion topic. This general scripting approach is referred to as a ``conflict schema.'' Prior studies suggest that a specific conflict schema script known as personally-seeded discussion is more productive for students than a standard discussion format in terms of the structural quality of the resulting argumentation and participation within the discussions. The purpose of the current study involves comparing the personally-seeded script with a variant augmented-preset script to determine the relative contributions of components of the scripts in terms of (1) increasing personal engagement of the students versus optimizing of the starting seed-comments and (2) grouping students using the conflict schema approach versus random assignment of students to groups. The results suggest that engaging students in the exploration of a diverse set of preset discussion seed-comments coupled with a conflict schema approach leads to the highest gains in learning.},
keywords = {CLEAR},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{Sampsonimpactcollaborationoutcomes2009,
title = {The Impact of Collaboration on the Outcomes of Scientific Argumentation},
author = {Victor Sampson and Douglas Clark},
doi = {10.1002/sce.20306},
issn = {1098-237X},
year = {2009},
date = {2009-05-01},
urldate = {2017-11-19},
journal = {Science Education},
volume = {93},
number = {3},
pages = {448--484},
abstract = {This study examines three questions about the impact of collaboration during scientific argumentation. First, do groups craft better arguments than individuals? Second, to what degree do individuals adopt and internalize the arguments crafted by their group? Third, do individuals who work in groups learn more from their experiences than individuals who work on their own? To examine these questions, 168 high school chemistry students were randomly assigned, using a matched pair design to collaborative or individual argumentation conditions. Students in both treatment conditions first completed a task that required them to produce an argument articulating and justifying an explanation for a discrepant event. The students then completed mastery and transfer problems on their own. The results of this study indicate that (a) groups of students did not produce better arguments than students who worked alone, (b) a substantial proportion of the students adopted at least some elements of their group's argument, and (c) students from the collaborative condition demonstrated superior performance on the mastery and transfer problems. These observations indicate that collaboration was beneficial for individual learning but not for initial performance on the task. The study concludes with a discussion of these observations and recommendations for future research. textcopyright 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Sci Ed93: 448–484, 2009},
keywords = {CLEAR, TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{OzdemirKnowledgestructurecoherence2009,
title = {Knowledge Structure Coherence in Turkish Students' Understanding of Force},
author = {Gokhan Ozdemir and Douglas Clark},
doi = {10.1002/tea.20290},
issn = {1098-2736},
year = {2009},
date = {2009-05-01},
urldate = {2017-11-19},
journal = {Journal of Research in Science Teaching},
volume = {46},
number = {5},
pages = {570--596},
abstract = {This study investigates Turkish students' knowledge structure coherence in physics. In particular, this study investigates the conflicting findings reported in Ioannides and Vosniadou's [Ioannides and Vosniadou [2002] Cognitive Science Quarterly, 2, 5–61] and diSessa, Gillespie, and Esterly's [diSessa et al. [2004] Cognitive Science, 28, 843–900] studies about students' understandings of force. Ioannides and Vosniadou's study of four different age levels of students in Greece demonstrated broad consistency in students' understandings of force. diSessa and colleagues' quasi-replication in the United States demonstrated conflicting results supporting a more fragmented elemental perspective on students' knowledge structure coherence. The current study investigates these conflicting findings by studying students in a third country using the analytic methods from both studies to clarify the debate over knowledge structure coherence. The levels of consistency demonstrated by students in the current study are somewhat higher than the levels reported by diSessa, Gillespie, and Esterly according to both coding schemes, but are closer overall to the levels reported by diSessa, Gillespie, and Esterly than to the levels reported by Ioannides and Vosniadou. In addition, closer inspection of students' explanations suggests that students' explanations may code as consistent according to the coding schemes for a particular force meaning category but not actually represent a coherent understanding of that force meaning. These results therefore more closely support fragmented elemental perspectives on knowledge structure coherence. The results, however, demonstrate important systematicities in students' thinking and support the possibility that differences between the student populations in the countries of the original studies contributed to the differences in findings of the original studies. textcopyright 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 46: 570–596, 2009},
keywords = {CLEAR},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@book{SlottaWISEScienceWebBased2009,
title = {WISE Science: Web-Based Inquiry in the Classroom},
author = {James D Slotta and Marcia C Linn},
isbn = {978-0-8077-4949-4},
year = {2009},
date = {2009-04-01},
publisher = {Teachers College Press},
address = {New York},
abstract = {This book shares the lessons learned by a large community of educational researchers and science teachers as they designed, developed, and investigated a new technology-enhanced learning environment known as WISE: The Web-based Inquiry Science Environment. WISE offers a collection of free, customizable curriculum projects on topics central to the science standards as well as guidance for teachers on how these Internet-based projects can be used to improve learning and instruction in their science classrooms (grades 6-12). Hundreds of teachers and over 100,000 students have learned from WISE projects taught in English, Norwegian, Dutch, German, Hebrew, Chinese, and Korean. Highlights of WISE include:* A wealth of findings about the WISE curriculum and assessments from 10 years of research funded by the U.S. National Science Foundation.* A collection of classroom-tested, inquiry-based curriculum projects that are available to every classroom via the Internet, free of charge.* An accumulation of successful practices, patterns, and principles to guide classroom teachers and curriculum designers.* Effective models of professional development and school partnerships that support teachers in integrating inquiry-based methods in their own curriculum.* Key strategies and recommendations for policymakers.},
keywords = {CLEAR, TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {book}
}

@article{SlottaWISEtechnologylessons2009,
title = {WISE Technology Lessons: Moving from a Local Proprietary System to a Global Open Source Framework},
author = {J D Slotta and Turadg Aleahmad},
year = {2009},
date = {2009-01-01},
journal = {Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning},
volume = {4},
number = {2},
pages = {169--189},
keywords = {CLEAR, TELS, VISUAL},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@incollection{CoxWhatdesignknowledge2009,
title = {What Is Design Knowledge and How Do We Teach It?},
author = {C D Cox and Christopher Hoadley},
editor = {Chris DiGiano and Shelley Goldman and Michael Chorost},
year = {2009},
date = {2009-01-01},
booktitle = {Educating Learning Technology Designers: Guiding and Inspiring Creators of Innovative Educational Tools},
pages = {19--35},
publisher = {Taylor & Francis},
address = {New York},
edition = {1st},
keywords = {TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {incollection}
}

@article{KaliDesignPrinciplesDatabase2009,
title = {The Design Principles Database},
author = {Yael Kali and Rachel Levin-Peled and Meytal Hans and Tamar Ronen-Fuhrmann},
doi = {10.18848/1833-1874/CGP/v03i01/37587},
issn = {1833-1874, 2473-5736},
year = {2009},
date = {2009-01-01},
urldate = {2017-11-20},
journal = {Design Principles and Practices: An International Journal—Annual Review},
volume = {3},
number = {1},
pages = {55--66},
keywords = {TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{Shamir-InbalTeachersDesignersOnline2009,
title = {Teachers as Designers of Online Activities},
author = {Tamar Shamir-Inbal and Yael Kali},
doi = {10.18848/1833-1874/CGP/v03i01/37596},
issn = {1833-1874, 2473-5736},
year = {2009},
date = {2009-01-01},
urldate = {2017-11-20},
journal = {Design Principles and Practices: An International Journal—Annual Review},
volume = {3},
number = {1},
pages = {89--102},
keywords = {TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@book{KaliDesigningCoherentScience2008,
title = {Designing Coherent Science Education: Implications for Curriculum, Instruction, and Policy},
author = {Yael Kali},
editor = {Marcia C Linn and Jo Ellen Roseman},
isbn = {978-0-8077-4913-5},
year = {2008},
date = {2008-09-01},
publisher = {Teachers College Press},
address = {New York},
abstract = {Too often in today's science classes, students learn isolated facts but are unprepared to apply scientific thinking outside of checking off answers on standardized tests. Designing Coherent Science Education demonstrates how effective instruction, supported by research-based curriculum materials and technologies, prepares learners to use scientific principles to make sense of the world around them. Arising from the National Science Foundation-funded Delineating and Evaluating Coherent Instructional Designs for Education (DECIDE) project, this volume brings together experts in curriculum development, technology-assisted learning, diversity, teacher education, and assessment to consider strategies that will help students achieve a more integrated understanding of science.},
keywords = {CLEAR, TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {book}
}

@article{VarmaTargetedSupportUsing2008,
title = {Targeted Support for Using Technology-Enhanced Science Inquiry Modules},
author = {Keisha Varma and Freda Husic and Marcia C Linn},
doi = {10.1007/s10956-008-9104-8},
issn = {1059-0145, 1573-1839},
year = {2008},
date = {2008-08-01},
urldate = {2017-11-19},
journal = {Journal of Science Education and Technology},
volume = {17},
number = {4},
pages = {341--356},
abstract = {Designing effective professional development experiences for technology-enhanced inquiry instruction is the goal of the Technology Enhanced Learning in Science (TELS) NSF funded Center for Learning and Teaching. In order to provide this type of support to a large number of teachers, we devised a targeted professional development approach. Participating teachers implemented short inquiry modules that featured interactive scientific visualizations. We collaborated with 16 schools in eight districts and five states. This paper reports the design, implementation, and refinement of the targeted approach. Findings from interview data show that teachers faced challenges that are often associated with enacting technology innovations in K-12 classrooms. The targeted professional development approach addressed the challenges and allowed teachers to successfully implement the modules in their classrooms. The interview data clarify teachers' perspectives on how using technology impacted their teaching practices and their ideas about student learning. This work contributes to a growing body of literature that identifies and addresses barriers to integrating technology into K-12 classrooms.},
keywords = {CLEAR, MODELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{HydeGenderSimilaritiesCharacterize2008,
title = {Gender Similarities Characterize Math Performance},
author = {Janet S Hyde and Sara M Lindberg and Marcia C Linn and Amy B Ellis and Caroline C Williams},
doi = {10.1126/science.1160364},
issn = {0036-8075, 1095-9203},
year = {2008},
date = {2008-07-01},
urldate = {2017-11-19},
journal = {Science},
volume = {321},
number = {5888},
pages = {494--495},
abstract = {Standardized tests in the U.S. indicate that girls now score just as well as boys in math.},
keywords = {CLEAR},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@incollection{LinnTeachingConceptualCange2008,
title = {Teaching for Conceptual Cange: Distinguish or Extinguish Ideas},
author = {Marcia C Linn},
editor = {Stella Vosniadou},
isbn = {978-0-8058-6044-3},
year = {2008},
date = {2008-06-01},
booktitle = {International Handbook of Research on Conceptual Change},
pages = {694--722},
publisher = {Routledge},
address = {New York},
edition = {1st edition},
keywords = {CLEAR},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {incollection}
}

@article{SampsonAssessmentwaysstudents2008,
title = {Assessment of the Ways Students Generate Arguments in Science Education: Current Perspectives and Recommendations for Future Directions},
author = {Victor Sampson and Douglas B Clark},
doi = {10.1002/sce.20276},
issn = {1098-237X},
year = {2008},
date = {2008-05-01},
urldate = {2017-11-19},
journal = {Science Education},
volume = {92},
number = {3},
pages = {447--472},
abstract = {Theoretical and empirical research on argument and argumentation in science education has intensified over the last two decades. The term ``argument'' in this review refers to the artifacts that a student or a group of students create when asked to articulate and justify claims or explanations whereas the term ``argumentation'' refers to the process of constructing these artifacts. The intent of this review is to provide an overview of several analytic frameworks that science educators use to assess and characterize the nature of or quality of scientific arguments in terms of three focal issues: structure, justification, and content. To highlight the foci, affordances, and constraints of these different analytic methods, the review of each framework includes an analysis of a sample argument. The review concludes with a synthesis of the three focal issues and outlines several recommendations for future work. Ultimately, this examination and synthesis of these frameworks in terms of how each conceptualizes argument structure, justification, and content is intended to provide a theoretical foundation for future research on argument in science education. textcopyright 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Sci Ed92:447–472, 2008},
keywords = {TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{LiuAssessingKnowledgeIntegration2008,
title = {Assessing Knowledge Integration in Science: Construct, Measures, and Evidence},
author = {Ou Lydia Liu and Hee-Sun Lee and Carolyn Hofstetter and Marcia C Linn},
doi = {10.1080/10627190801968224},
issn = {1062-7197},
year = {2008},
date = {2008-04-01},
urldate = {2017-11-19},
journal = {Educational Assessment},
volume = {13},
number = {1},
pages = {33--55},
abstract = {In response to the demand for sound science assessments, this article presents the development of a latent construct called knowledge integration as an effective measure of science inquiry. Knowledge integration assessments ask students to link, distinguish, evaluate, and organize their ideas about complex scientific topics. The article focuses on assessment topics commonly taught in 6th- through 12th-grade classes. Items from both published standardized tests and previous knowledge integration research were examined in 6 subject-area tests. Results from Rasch partial credit analyses revealed that the tests exhibited satisfactory psychometric properties with respect to internal consistency, item fit, weighted likelihood estimates, discrimination, and differential item functioning. Compared with items coded using dichotomous scoring rubrics, those coded with the knowledge integration rubrics yielded significantly higher discrimination indexes. The knowledge integration assessment tasks, analyzed using knowledge integration scoring rubrics, demonstrate strong promise as effective measures of complex science reasoning in varied science domains.},
keywords = {CLEAR, MODELS, TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{WilliamsMakingMitosisVisible2008,
title = {Making Mitosis Visible},
author = {Michelle Williams and Marcia C Linn and Gail P Hollowell},
issn = {0887-2376},
year = {2008},
date = {2008-03-01},
urldate = {2017-11-18},
journal = {Science Scope},
volume = {31},
number = {7},
pages = {42--49},
abstract = {The Technology-Enhanced Learning in Science (TELS) center, a National Science Foundation-funded Center for Learning and Teaching, offers research-tested science modules for students in grades 6-12 (Linn et al. 2006). These free, online modules engage students in scientific inquiry through collaborative activities that include online investigations, interactive visualizations, and electronic discussions that allow teachers to access detailed accounts of student learning (Williams and Lynn 2003). This paper reports on how the Mitosis and Cell process module worked in a seventh-grade classroom in an urban school. (Contains 6 figures and 2 online resources.)},
keywords = {CLEAR, MODELS, TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{ClarkAssessingdialogicargumentation2008,
title = {Assessing Dialogic Argumentation in Online Environments to Relate Structure, Grounds, and Conceptual Quality},
author = {Douglas B Clark and Victor Sampson},
doi = {10.1002/tea.20216},
issn = {1098-2736},
year = {2008},
date = {2008-03-01},
urldate = {2017-11-19},
journal = {Journal of Research in Science Teaching},
volume = {45},
number = {3},
pages = {293--321},
abstract = {The national science standards, along with prominent researchers, call for increased focus on scientific argumentation in the classroom. Over the past decade, researchers have developed sophisticated online science learning environments to support these opportunities for scientific argumentation. Assessing the quality of dialogic argumentation, however, has proven challenging. Existing analytic frameworks assess dialogic argumentation in terms of the nature of students' discourse, formal argumentation structure, interactions, and epistemic forms of reasoning. Few frameworks, however, connect these assessments to conceptual quality. We present an analytic framework for assessing argumentation in online science learning environments that relates levels of opposition with discourse moves, use of grounds, and conceptual quality. We then apply the proposed framework to students' dialogic argumentation within a representative online science learning environment to investigate the framework's potential affordances as well as to assess issues of reliability and appropriateness. The results suggest that the framework offers significant affordances and that it also offers high interrater reliability for trained coders. The applicability of the framework for offline contexts and future extensions of the framework are discussed in light of these results. textcopyright 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 45: 293–321, 2008},
keywords = {TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{GerardPrincipalLeadershipTechnologyenhanced2008,
title = {Principal Leadership for Technology-Enhanced Learning in Science},
author = {Libby F Gerard and Jane B Bowyer and Marcia C Linn},
doi = {10.1007/s10956-007-9070-6},
issn = {1059-0145, 1573-1839},
year = {2008},
date = {2008-02-01},
urldate = {2017-11-19},
journal = {Journal of Science Education and Technology},
volume = {17},
number = {1},
pages = {1--18},
abstract = {Reforms such as technology-enhanced instruction require principal leadership. Yet, many principals report that they need help to guide implementation of science and technology reforms. We identify strategies for helping principals provide this leadership. A two-phase design is employed. In the first phase we elicit principals' varied ideas about the Technology-enhanced Learning in Science (TELS) curriculum materials being implemented by teachers in their schools, and in the second phase we engage principals in a leadership workshop designed based on the ideas they generated. Analysis uses an emergent coding scheme to categorize principals' ideas, and a knowledge integration framework to capture the development of these ideas. The analysis suggests that principals frame their thinking about the implementation of TELS in terms of: principal leadership, curriculum, educational policy, teacher learning, student outcomes and financial resources. They seek to improve their own knowledge to support this reform. The principals organize their ideas around individual school goals and current political issues. Principals prefer professional development activities that engage them in reviewing curricula and student work with other principals. Based on the analysis, this study offers guidelines for creating learning opportunities that enhance principals' leadership abilities in technology and science reform.},
keywords = {CLEAR, MODELS, TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{KaliDesigningEffectiveVisualizations2008,
title = {Designing Effective Visualizations for Elementary School Science},
author = {Yael Kali and Marcia C Linn},
doi = {10.1086/590525},
issn = {0013-5984},
year = {2008},
date = {2008-01-01},
urldate = {2017-11-18},
journal = {The Elementary School Journal},
volume = {109},
number = {2},
pages = {181--198},
abstract = {Research has shown that technology-enhanced visualizations can improve inquiry learning in science when they are designed to support knowledge integration. Visualizations play an especially important role in supporting science learning at elementary and middle school levels because they can make unseen and complex processes visible. We identify 4 principles that can help designers and teachers incorporate visualizations into curriculum materials. These principles call for (a) reducing visual complexity to help learners recognize salient information, (b) scaffolding the process of generating explanations, (c) supporting student-initiated modeling of complex science, and (d) using multiple linked representations. We describe the principles, discuss patterns combining the principles, and give examples from several science disciplines.},
keywords = {CLEAR, MODELS, TELS, VISUAL},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@incollection{DeBoerAssessingIntegratedUnderstanding2008,
title = {Assessing Integrated Understanding of Science},
author = {George E DeBoer and Hee-Sun Lee and Freda Husic},
editor = {Yael Kali and Marcia C Linn and Jo Ellen Roseman},
year = {2008},
date = {2008-01-01},
booktitle = {Designing Coherent Science Education: Implications for Curriculum, Instruction, and Policy},
pages = {153--182},
publisher = {Teachers College Press},
address = {New York},
keywords = {CLEAR, TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {incollection}
}

@incollection{KaliPreface2008,
title = {Preface},
author = {Yael Kali and Jo Ellen Roseman and M C Linn},
editor = {Yael Kali and Marcia C Linn and Jo Ellen Roseman},
year = {2008},
date = {2008-01-01},
booktitle = {Designing Coherent Science Education: Implications for Curriculum, Instruction, and Policy},
pages = {xi--xxi},
publisher = {Teachers College Press},
address = {New York},
keywords = {CLEAR},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {incollection}
}

@incollection{LinnPoliciesPromoteCoherence2008,
title = {Policies to Promote Coherence},
author = {M C Linn and Yael Kali and E A Davis and P Horwitz},
editor = {Yael Kali and Marcia C Linn and Jo Ellen Roseman},
year = {2008},
date = {2008-01-01},
booktitle = {Designing Coherent Science Education: Implications for Curriculum, Instruction, and Policy},
pages = {201--210},
publisher = {Teachers College Press},
address = {New York},
keywords = {CLEAR},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {incollection}
}

@incollection{RosemanCharacterizingCurriculumCoherence2008,
title = {Characterizing Curriculum Coherence},
author = {Jo Ellen Roseman and M C Linn and M Koppal},
editor = {Yael Kali and M C Linn and Jo Ellen Roseman},
year = {2008},
date = {2008-01-01},
booktitle = {Designing Coherent Science Education: Implications for Curriculum, Instruction, and Policy},
pages = {13--38},
publisher = {Teachers College Press},
address = {New York},
keywords = {CLEAR},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {incollection}
}

@article{HigginsSupportingTeachersUse2008,
title = {Supporting Teachers' Use of Technology in Science Instruction Through Professional Development: A Literature Review},
author = {Tara E Higgins and Michele W Spitulnik},
doi = {10.1007/s10956-008-9118-2},
issn = {1059-0145, 1573-1839},
year = {2008},
date = {2008-01-01},
urldate = {2017-11-18},
journal = {Journal of Science Education and Technology},
volume = {17},
number = {5},
pages = {511--521},
abstract = {Professional development is critical in supporting teachers' use of technological tools in classrooms. This review of empirical research synthesizes the effective elements of professional development programs that support science teachers in learning about technology integration. Studies are examined that explore how professional development supports technology use within inquiry-based and traditional science instruction. Implications for future research are discussed in four areas: understanding and building on teachers' beliefs about science and technology; supporting teacher learning by supporting teachers' examination of students' work; using technology to support teacher communities and social networks; and sustaining teachers' learning beyond formal professional development programs.},
keywords = {MODELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{Ronen-FuhrmannHelpingEducationStudents2008,
title = {Helping Education Students Understand Learning through Designing},
author = {Tamar Ronen-Fuhrmann and Yael Kali and Christopher Hoadley},
issn = {0013-1962},
year = {2008},
date = {2008-01-01},
urldate = {2017-11-19},
journal = {Educational Technology},
volume = {48},
number = {2},
pages = {26--33},
abstract = {This article describes a course in which graduate students in education learn practical and theoretical aspects of educational design by creating technologies for learning. The course was built around three themes: "Analyzing technologies," in which students study state-of- the-art technologies and interview their designers; "design studio," in which students design their own technologies using an instructional model that was developed in this study; and "theory," in which literature is reviewed. Outcomes illustrate tensions between students' professed beliefs about learning and their actual design practices in four dimensions that characterize the technologies they designed: "Learner activity," "Collaboration," "Autonomy," and "Content accessibility." Via peer-negotiating of these tensions in each of the course themes, students have developed their skills to design educational technologies and increased the coherence of their epistemological understanding of how people learn. (Contains 3 figures and 1 table.)},
keywords = {TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@incollection{CoxApplyingStudioModel2008,
title = {Applying the ``Studio Model'' to Learning Technology Design},
author = {C D Cox and C Harrison and Christopher Hoadley},
editor = {Chris DiGiano and Shelley Goldman and Michael Chorost},
isbn = {978-0-8058-6471-7},
year = {2008},
date = {2008-01-01},
booktitle = {Educating Learning Technology Designers: Guiding and Inspiring Creators of Innovative Educational Tools},
pages = {145--164},
publisher = {Taylor & Francis},
address = {New York},
edition = {1st},
keywords = {TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {incollection}
}

@incollection{KaliTechnologyenhancedsupportstrategies2007,
title = {Technology-Enhanced Support Strategies for Inquiry Learning},
author = {Yael Kali and Marcia C Linn},
editor = {Michael J Spector and David M Merrill and Jeroen van Merrienboer and Marcy P Driscoll},
isbn = {978-0-415-96338-1},
year = {2007},
date = {2007-12-01},
booktitle = {Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology: Third Edition},
pages = {145--162},
publisher = {Routledge},
address = {New York},
edition = {3 edition},
keywords = {CLEAR},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {incollection}
}

@article{OzdemirOverviewConceptualChange2007,
title = {An Overview of Conceptual Change Theories},
author = {Gökhan Özdemir and Douglas B Clark},
doi = {10.12973/ejmste/75414},
issn = {1305-8215, 1305-8223},
year = {2007},
date = {2007-12-01},
urldate = {2017-11-19},
journal = {Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education},
volume = {3},
number = {4},
pages = {351--361},
abstract = {Conceptual change researchers have made significant progress on two prominent but competing theoretical perspectives regarding knowledge structure coherence. These perspectives can be broadly characterized as (1) knowledge-as-theory perspectives and (2) knowledge-as-elements perspectives. These...},
keywords = {MODELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{LinnDifferencesSimilaritiesMathematics2007,
title = {Differences or Similarities in Mathematics? Finding an Integrating Focus},
author = {M C Linn and Cathy Kessel},
doi = {10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00375_2.x},
issn = {1471-6402},
year = {2007},
date = {2007-09-01},
urldate = {2017-11-19},
journal = {Psychology of Women Quarterly},
volume = {31},
number = {3},
pages = {323--324},
keywords = {TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{ClarkAnalyticFrameworksAssessing2007,
title = {Analytic Frameworks for Assessing Dialogic Argumentation in Online Learning Environments},
author = {Douglas B Clark and Victor Sampson and Armin Weinberger and Gijsbert Erkens},
doi = {10.1007/s10648-007-9050-7},
issn = {1040-726X, 1573-336X},
year = {2007},
date = {2007-09-01},
urldate = {2017-11-19},
journal = {Educational Psychology Review},
volume = {19},
number = {3},
pages = {343--374},
abstract = {Over the last decade, researchers have developed sophisticated online learning environments to support students engaging in dialogic argumentation. This review examines five categories of analytic frameworks for measuring participant interactions within these environments focusing on (1) formal argumentation structure, (2) conceptual quality, (3) nature and function of contributions within the dialogue, (4) epistemic nature of reasoning, and (5) argumentation sequences and interaction patterns. Ultimately, the review underscores the diversity of theoretical perspectives represented within this research, the nature of dialogic interaction within these environments, the importance of clearly specifying theoretical and environmental commitments throughout the process of developing or adopting an analytic framework, and the role of analytic frameworks in the future development of online learning environments for argumentation.},
keywords = {TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{LinnWhyarenmore2007,
title = {Why Aren't More Women in Science?},
author = {Marcia C Linn},
doi = {10.1126/science.1141569},
issn = {0036-8075},
year = {2007},
date = {2007-07-01},
journal = {Science},
volume = {317},
number = {5835},
pages = {199--200},
abstract = {WOS:000247968600023},
keywords = {TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{WeinbergerArgumentativeKnowledgeConstruction2007,
title = {Argumentative Knowledge Construction in Online Learning Environments in and across Different Cultures: A Collaboration Script Perspective},
author = {A Weinberger and D B Clark and P HÄkkinen and Y Tamura and F Fischer},
doi = {10.2304/rcie.2007.2.1.68},
issn = {1745-4999},
year = {2007},
date = {2007-03-01},
urldate = {2017-11-19},
journal = {Research in Comparative and International Education},
volume = {2},
number = {1},
pages = {68--79},
abstract = {In recent years, information and communication technology has established new opportunities to participate in online learning environments around the globe. These opportunities include the dissemination of specific online learning environments as well as opportunities for learners to connect to online learning environments in distant locations. These dissemination and distance learning scenarios create potential challenges, however, in terms of the cultural differences in the internal scripts that learners of different cultures bring to these environments. This article considers these issues and challenges specifically for online environments focusing on argumentative knowledge construction. It discusses the importance of cross-cultural research in this area and proposes that a collaboration script perspective may prove extremely valuable for this research.},
keywords = {TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{SampsonIncorporatingScientificArgumentation2007,
title = {Incorporating Scientific Argumentation into Inquiry-Based Activities with Online Personally Seeded Discussions},
author = {Victor Sampson and Douglas Clark},
issn = {0887-2376},
year = {2007},
date = {2007-02-01},
urldate = {2017-11-19},
journal = {Science Scope},
volume = {30},
number = {6},
pages = {43--47},
abstract = {An explicit goal of the current reform movement in science education is to promote scientific literacy in the United States. One way to encourage scientific literacy is to help students develop a better understanding of science subject matter, that is, the declarative knowledge specifically associated with the physical, life, and earth sciences. However, in addition to helping students develop this type of knowledge, science education programs designed to promote true scientific literacy need to also help learners understand how this knowledge is generated, justified, and evaluated by scientists and how to use such knowledge to engage in inquiry in a way that reflects the practices of the scientific community. In this literature, inquiry is described as a knowledge-building process in which explanations are developed to make sense of data and then presented to a community of peers so they can be critiqued, debated, and revised. Thus, the ability to engage in argumentation in order to construct, justify, and evaluate scientific explanations is seen by many as an important component of scientific literacy. In order to foster productive argumentation in science classrooms, the authors have developed the personally seeded discussion (PSD). This article talks about PSD and its benefits. The PSD is an online asynchronous discussion forum that automatically sorts participants into small groups based on the nature of students' ideas. This tool is currently embedded into an online science project called "Thermodynamics: Probing Your Surroundings." (Contains 3 figures.)},
keywords = {TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{ClarkPersonallySeededDiscussions2007,
title = {Personally-Seeded Discussions to Scaffold Online Argumentation},
author = {Douglas B Clark and Victor D Sampson},
doi = {10.1080/09500690600560944},
issn = {0950-0693},
year = {2007},
date = {2007-02-01},
urldate = {2017-11-19},
journal = {International Journal of Science Education},
volume = {29},
number = {3},
pages = {253--277},
abstract = {Research shows that scientific knowledge develops through a process of decision-making as well as discovery, and that argumentation is a genre of discourse crucial to the practice of science. Students should therefore be supported in understanding the scientific practices of dialectical and rhetorical argumentation as part of learning about scientific inquiry. This study focuses on supporting scientific argumentation in the classroom through a customized online discourse system. ``Personally-seeded discussions'' support learning and collaboration through an activity structure that elicits, shares, and contrasts students' own ideas to engage them in the discourse of science argumentation and inquiry. Students use an online interface to build principles to describe data they have collected. These principles become the seed comments for the online discussions. The software sorts students into discussion groups with students who have built different principles so that each discussion group can consider and critique multiple perspectives. This study explores the efficacy of this personally-seeded approach based on a coding scheme developed by Erduran, Osborne, and Simon that analyzes argument structure from a Toulmin perspective. As part of this exploration, the study outlines a method for parsing personally-seeded discussions into oppositional episodes for analysis, and discusses future directions for supporting argumentation in asynchronous online discussions.},
keywords = {TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{HorwitzComputersCleanSlates2007,
title = {Computers and Clean Slates: Creating Interactive Learning Experiences},
author = {P Horwitz},
year = {2007},
date = {2007-01-01},
journal = {@Concord},
volume = {11},
number = {1},
keywords = {TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{Medina-JerezScienceELLRethinking2007,
title = {Science for ELL: Re-Thinking Our Approach},
author = {William Medina-Jerez and Douglas B Clark and A Medina and Frank Ramirez-Marin},
year = {2007},
date = {2007-01-01},
journal = {The Science Teacher},
volume = {74},
number = {3},
pages = {52--56},
keywords = {TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{TinkerHowstudentslearn2007,
title = {How Do Students Learn from Models? Case Studies in Guided Inquiry},
author = {Robert Tinker},
year = {2007},
date = {2007-01-01},
journal = {@Concord},
volume = {11},
number = {1},
pages = {14},
keywords = {TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{TinkerPotholesroadproving2007,
title = {Potholes in the Road to Proving Technology},
author = {Robert Tinker},
year = {2007},
date = {2007-01-01},
journal = {@Concord},
volume = {11},
number = {1},
pages = {2},
keywords = {TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{Tinkerscienceatomsmolecules2007,
title = {The Science of Atoms and Molecules},
author = {Robert Tinker},
year = {2007},
date = {2007-01-01},
journal = {@Concord},
volume = {11},
number = {1},
pages = {10},
keywords = {TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{XieRovingmolecules2007,
title = {Roving around Molecules},
author = {Qian Xie and Robert Tinker},
year = {2007},
date = {2007-01-01},
journal = {@Concord},
volume = {11},
number = {1},
pages = {8},
keywords = {TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{ZuckerProbewareXO2007,
title = {Probeware and the XO},
author = {A Zucker and A H Galvis and Robert Tinker},
year = {2007},
date = {2007-01-01},
journal = {@Concord},
volume = {11},
number = {1},
pages = {4},
keywords = {TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{HydeGenderSimilaritiesMathematics2006,
title = {Gender Similarities in Mathematics and Science},
author = {Janet Shibley Hyde and Marcia C Linn},
doi = {10.1126/science.1132154},
issn = {0036-8075, 1095-9203},
year = {2006},
date = {2006-10-01},
urldate = {2017-11-19},
journal = {Science},
volume = {314},
number = {5799},
pages = {599--600},
abstract = {Boys and girls have similar psychological traits and cognitive abilities; thus, a focus on factors other than gender is needed to help girls persist in mathematical and scientific career tracks.},
keywords = {TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{LinnTeachingAssessingKnowledge2006,
title = {Teaching and Assessing Knowledge Integration in Science},
author = {Marcia C Linn and Hee-Sun Lee and Robert Tinker and Freda Husic and Jennifer L Chiu},
doi = {10.1126/science.1131408},
issn = {0036-8075, 1095-9203},
year = {2006},
date = {2006-08-01},
urldate = {2017-11-18},
journal = {Science},
volume = {313},
number = {5790},
pages = {1049--1050},
abstract = {Interactive visualizations combined with online inquiry and embedded assessments can deepen student understanding of complex ideas in science.},
keywords = {MODELS, TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{ClarkLongitudinalConceptualChange2006,
title = {Longitudinal Conceptual Change in Students' Understanding of Thermal Equilibrium: An Examination of the Process of Conceptual Restructuring},
author = {Douglas B Clark},
doi = {10.1207/s1532690xci2404_3},
issn = {0737-0008},
year = {2006},
date = {2006-08-01},
urldate = {2017-11-19},
journal = {Cognition and Instruction},
volume = {24},
number = {4},
pages = {467--563},
abstract = {This research analyzes students' conceptual change across a semester in an 8th-grade thermodynamics curriculum. Fifty students were interviewed 5 times during their 8th-grade semester and then again preceding their 10th- and 12th-grade years to follow their subsequent progress. The interview questions probed students' understanding of thermodynamics in everyday situations. The analysis of the transcripts first focuses on the full cohort. The analysis then focuses on 2 fairly successful and 2 less successful students in greater detail. Direct quotations provide the primary warrants in the analysis of the 4 case-study students, but the analysis also incorporates 2 new analytical–representational forms to map students' conceptual change trajectories. Ultimately, the results clarify the conceptual change processes through which students' understandings of thermal equilibrium evolve from disjointed sets of context-dependent ideas toward, if not achieving, integrated cohesive perspectives.},
keywords = {TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{KaliCollaborativeknowledgebuilding2006,
title = {Collaborative Knowledge Building Using the Design Principles Database},
author = {Yael Kali},
doi = {10.1007/s11412-006-8993-x},
issn = {1556-1607, 1556-1615},
year = {2006},
date = {2006-06-01},
urldate = {2017-11-19},
journal = {International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning},
volume = {1},
number = {2},
pages = {187--201},
abstract = {In this study we describe a mechanism for supporting a community of learning scientists who are exploring educational technologies by helping them to share and collaboratively build design knowledge. The Design Principles Database (DPD) is intended to be built and used by this community to provide an infrastructure for participants to publish, connect, discuss and review design ideas, and to use these ideas to create new designs. The potential of the DPD to serve as a collaborative knowledge-building endeavor is illustrated by analysis of a CSCL study focused on peer-evaluation. The analysis demonstrates how the DPD was used by the researchers of the peer-evaluation study in three phases. In the first phase, design principles were articulated based on a literature review and contributed to the DPD. In the second phase, a peer-evaluation activity was designed based on these principles, and was enacted and revised in a three-iteration study. In the third phase, lessons learned through these iterations were fed back to the DPD. The analysis indicates that such processes can contribute to collaborative development of design knowledge in a community of the learning sciences. Readers of ijCSCL are invited to take part in this endeavor and share their design knowledge with the community.},
keywords = {TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@incollection{LinnScienceEducationIntegrating2006,
title = {Science Education: Integrating Views of Learning and Instruction},
author = {M C Linn and Bat-Sheva Eylon},
editor = {Patricia A Alexander and PHILIP H WINNE},
isbn = {978-0-8058-5971-3},
year = {2006},
date = {2006-05-01},
booktitle = {Handbook of Educational Psychology},
pages = {511--544},
publisher = {Routledge},
address = {Mahwah, N.J},
edition = {2 edition},
keywords = {MODELS, TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {incollection}
}

@incollection{LinnKnowledgeIntegrationPerspective2006,
title = {The Knowledge Integration Perspective on Learning and Instruction},
author = {M C Linn},
editor = {Keith R Sawyer},
isbn = {978-0-521-60777-3},
year = {2006},
date = {2006-04-01},
booktitle = {The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences},
pages = {243--264},
publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
address = {Cambridge ; New York},
edition = {1 edition},
keywords = {MODELS, TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {incollection}
}

@incollection{LinnWISEteachersUsing2006,
title = {WISE Teachers: Using Technology and Inquiry for Science Instruction},
author = {Marcia C Linn},
editor = {Elizabeth Alexander Ashburn and Robert E Floden},
isbn = {978-0-8077-4684-4},
year = {2006},
date = {2006-03-01},
booktitle = {Meaningful Learning Using Technology: What Educators Need to Know And Do},
pages = {46--69},
publisher = {Teachers College Pr},
address = {New York},
keywords = {MODELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {incollection}
}

@article{LinnScienceLearningLearning2006,
title = {The Science of Learning and the Learning of Science},
author = {Marcia C Linn and Robert Bjork},
year = {2006},
date = {2006-03-01},
urldate = {2017-11-19},
journal = {APS Observer},
volume = {19},
number = {3},
abstract = {Students' performance during instruction is commonly viewed as a measure of learning and a basis for evaluating and selecting instructional practices. Laboratory findings question that view: Conditions of practice that appear optimal łdots},
keywords = {TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{CaspersonUsingvisualizationsteach2006,
title = {Using Visualizations to Teach Electrostatics},
author = {Janet M Casperson and Marcia C Linn},
doi = {10.1119/1.2186335},
issn = {0002-9505},
year = {2006},
date = {2006-03-01},
urldate = {2017-11-19},
journal = {American Journal of Physics},
volume = {74},
number = {4},
pages = {316--323},
keywords = {TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{BjorkScienceLearningLearning2006a,
title = {The Science of Learning and the Learning of Science Introducing Desirable Difficulties},
author = {Robert Bjork and Marcia Linn},
year = {2006},
date = {2006-01-01},
journal = {The APS Observer},
volume = {19},
keywords = {MODELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@incollection{WorellGenderassessment2006,
title = {Gender and Assessment},
editor = {Judith Worell and Carol D Goodheart and Marcia C Linn and Cathy Kessel},
isbn = {978-0-19-516203-5},
year = {2006},
date = {2006-01-01},
booktitle = {Handbook of Girls' and Women's Psychological Health},
pages = {40--50},
publisher = {Oxford University Press, USA},
abstract = {Google-Books-ID: YBdnDAAAQBAJ},
keywords = {MODELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {incollection}
}

@article{LinnVirtualCommunitiesWhen2006,
title = {Virtual Communities: When Do They Succeed?},
author = {Marcia C Linn},
editor = {Sasha A Barab and Rob Kling and James H Gray},
doi = {10.2307/20445373},
issn = {0002-9556},
year = {2006},
date = {2006-01-01},
urldate = {2017-11-19},
journal = {The American Journal of Psychology},
volume = {119},
number = {4},
pages = {679--685},
keywords = {TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{XieMolecularDynamicsSimulations2006,
title = {Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Chemical Reactions for Use in Education},
author = {Qian Xie and Robert Tinker},
doi = {10.1021/ed083p77},
issn = {0021-9584},
year = {2006},
date = {2006-01-01},
urldate = {2017-11-19},
journal = {Journal of Chemical Education},
volume = {83},
number = {1},
pages = {77},
abstract = {This paper reports a method of simulating chemical reaction kinetics by adding rule-based elementary reactions to a classical molecular dynamics simulation. The method can reproduce many important thermodynamic properties of chemical reactions, and can be used to build interactive software that runs on typical personal computers. Its capacity has many potential applications for learning the core ideas of chemistry.},
keywords = {TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{HorwitzHowCanAssessment2006,
title = {How Can Assessment Be Improved?},
author = {P Horwitz},
year = {2006},
date = {2006-01-01},
journal = {@Concord},
volume = {10},
number = {2},
keywords = {TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{HorwitzHelpingStudentsLearn2006,
title = {Helping Students Learn and Helping Teachers Understand Student Learning},
author = {P Horwitz and J Gobert and B Buckley},
year = {2006},
date = {2006-01-01},
journal = {@Concord},
volume = {10},
number = {2},
keywords = {TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{BerenfeldWhyareprogressions2006,
title = {Why Are Progressions Important?},
author = {B Berenfeld and Robert Tinker},
year = {2006},
date = {2006-01-01},
journal = {@Concord},
volume = {10},
number = {2},
pages = {4},
keywords = {TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{TinkerSTEMeducationneeds2006,
title = {STEM Education Needs a Major Overhaul},
author = {Robert Tinker},
year = {2006},
date = {2006-01-01},
journal = {@Concord},
volume = {10},
number = {2},
pages = {2},
keywords = {TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{TinkerWhatflowswhen2006,
title = {What Flows When Heat Flows?},
author = {Robert Tinker},
year = {2006},
date = {2006-01-01},
journal = {@Concord},
volume = {10},
number = {2},
pages = {8},
keywords = {TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{TinkerWhat21stcentury2006,
title = {What Is 21st Century Mathematics? Concepts Not Computation},
author = {Robert Tinker and Rob Tierney},
year = {2006},
date = {2006-01-01},
journal = {@Concord},
volume = {10},
number = {2},
pages = {10},
keywords = {TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@incollection{LinnGenderDifferencesCognition2006,
title = {Gender Differences in Cognition and Educational Performance},
author = {Marcia C Linn and Cathy Kessel},
isbn = {978-0-470-01886-6},
year = {2006},
date = {2006-01-01},
urldate = {2017-11-20},
booktitle = {Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science},
publisher = {John Wiley & Sons, Ltd},
abstract = {Gender differences in cognitive and educational performance refer to the apparent differences in the cognitive abilities of men and women, especially with respect to spatial and verbal tasks. They have been ascribed to both cultural and biological influences.},
keywords = {TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {incollection}
}

@incollection{LinnAssessmentGender2006,
title = {Assessment and Gender},
author = {Marcia C Linn and Cathy Kessel},
editor = {Judith Worell and Carol D Goodheart},
year = {2006},
date = {2006-01-01},
booktitle = {Handbook of Girls' and Women's Psychological Health: Gender and Well-Being Across the Lifespan},
pages = {40--50},
publisher = {Oxford University Press, USA},
address = {New York},
edition = {1 edition},
keywords = {TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {incollection}
}

@article{TateHowDoesIdentity2005,
title = {How Does Identity Shape the Experiences of Women of Color Engineering Students?},
author = {Erika D Tate and Marcia C Linn},
doi = {10.1007/s10956-005-0223-1},
issn = {1059-0145, 1573-1839},
year = {2005},
date = {2005-12-01},
urldate = {2017-11-19},
journal = {Journal of Science Education and Technology},
volume = {14},
number = {5-6},
pages = {483--493},
abstract = {This study seeks to understand the experiences of women of color engineering students who persist and identify some of the dilemmas they face. Evidence emerged that students formulate multiple identities to help them persist in their engineering programs. We assess the role that identity plays in the experiences of STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) women of color. This paper applies a multiple identities framework and presents students' experiences through the lenses of three emergent identities: academic, social, and intellectual. We discuss possible implications of the findings for academic and social support programs in higher education. We also identify some implications for precollege instruction.},
keywords = {TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{RavitzSupportingchangescholarship2005,
title = {Supporting Change and Scholarship through Review of Online Resources in Professional Development Settings},
author = {Jason Ravitz and Christopher Hoadley},
doi = {10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00567.x},
issn = {1467-8535},
year = {2005},
date = {2005-11-01},
urldate = {2017-11-19},
journal = {British Journal of Educational Technology},
volume = {36},
number = {6},
pages = {957--974},
abstract = {How can we accelerate innovation and ensure effective dissemination of knowledge about online learning resources? This paper advocates strategies that systematically link online professional development with the research, development and diffusion cycle. The systemic approach we describe can accelerate knowledge advancement and help manage change by improving communication among teachers, trainers, developers and researchers. The examples that are provided are set within two funded projects in the United States that led to the development of two distinct but related strategies—the Online Site Evaluation Form for educators (a web-based review form used in workshops) and a six-week online course on technology-supported assessments. Both strategies make it easier to give feedback to developers and offer incentives to do so in ways that help teachers to learn about online resources individually and with colleagues. The examples are discussed with analysis of their strengths and weaknesses in supporting different modes of interaction. We highlight implications for instructional development, professional development, research and knowledge management in online communities.},
keywords = {TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{OrionEffectEarthScienceLearning2005,
title = {The Effect of an Earth-Science Learning Program on Students' Scientific Thinking Skills},
author = {Nir Orion and Yael Kali},
doi = {10.5408/1089-9995-53.4.387},
issn = {1089-9995},
year = {2005},
date = {2005-09-01},
urldate = {2017-11-19},
journal = {Journal of Geoscience Education},
volume = {53},
number = {4},
pages = {387--393},
abstract = {This study explored junior high school students' understanding of essential concepts of scientific thinking ``observation'', ``hypothesis'' and ``conclusion'' and the effect of the learning of the program ``The Rock Cycle'' on the development of such understanding. The study sample consisted of 582 students of the 7th and 8th grade, who learned in 21 classes, with 14 teachers from 8 schools in Israel. The data collection was based on a quantitative research tool that was specifically developed for this study and qualitative tools such as observations and interviews. The findings indicated that the students have considerable difficulties in understanding the basic concepts underlying the scientific inquiry, and that the ``The Rock Cycle'' has a potential to develop such understanding. An unexpected gender difference was found. Girls outperformed boys in scientific thinking, both in the pre and the post tests. The unique character of geoscience methodology, together with structured-inquiry and metacognitive activities, served as an appropriate framework for students to develop basic scientific thinking. The co-interpretation of quantitative and qualitative analysis indicated that the type of teacher (openness to innovative methods, enthusiasm and scientific background) was a crucial factor in students' ability to exploit the potential of ``The Rock Cycle''.},
keywords = {TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{UnderwoodIDEAIdentifyingdesign2005,
title = {IDEA: Identifying Design Principles in Educational Applets},
author = {Jody S Underwood and Christopher Hoadley and Hollylynne Stohl Lee and Karen Hollebrands and Chris DiGiano and Ann K Renninger},
doi = {10.1007/BF02504868},
issn = {1042-1629, 1556-6501},
year = {2005},
date = {2005-06-01},
urldate = {2017-11-19},
journal = {Educational Technology Research and Development},
volume = {53},
number = {2},
pages = {99--112},
abstract = {The Internet is increasingly being used as a medium for educational software in the form of miniature applications (e.g., applets) to explore concepts in a domain. One such effort in mathematics education, the Educational Software Components of Tomorrow (ESCOT) project, created 42 miniature applications each consisting of a context, a set of questions, and one or more interactive applets to help students explore a mathematical concept. They were designed by experts in interface design, educational technology, and classroom teaching. However, some applications were more successful for fostering student problem-solving than others. This article describes the method used to mine a subset (25) of these applets for design principles that describe successful learner-centered design by drawing on such data as videos of students using the software and summaries of written student work. Twenty-one design principles were identified, falling into the categories of motivation, presentation, and support for problem solving. The main purpose of this article is to operationalize a method for post hoc extraction of design principles from an existing library of educational software, although readers may also find the design principles themselves to be useful.},
keywords = {TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@incollection{LinnWISEDesignLifelong2005,
title = {WISE Design for Lifelong Learning - Pivotal Cases},
author = {Marcia C Linn},
editor = {PETER GARDENFORS and Petter Johansson},
isbn = {978-0-8058-4280-7},
year = {2005},
date = {2005-04-01},
booktitle = {Cognition, Education, and Communication Technology},
pages = {223--256},
publisher = {Routledge},
address = {Mahwah, N.J},
edition = {1 edition},
keywords = {MODELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {incollection}
}

@article{KirbyInstructionalsystemsdesign2005,
title = {Instructional Systems Design and the Learning Sciences: A Citation Analysis},
author = {Joshuo A Kirby and Christopher M Hoadley and Alison A Carr-Chellman},
doi = {10.1007/BF02504856},
issn = {1042-1629, 1556-6501},
year = {2005},
date = {2005-03-01},
urldate = {2017-11-19},
journal = {Educational Technology Research and Development},
volume = {53},
number = {1},
pages = {37--47},
abstract = {Learning sciences (LS) and instructional systems design (ISD) are two related fields that have shared intersts in the application of technology for advancing human learning. While the two fields may have different values, boundaries, and in some cases methods, they also share significant overlap of content and purpose. We examine the relationship between the two fields through a citation analysis of three journals in each of the respective fields. The findings of the study indicate that the amount of cross-field publication is low, but there exists a trend for increased cross-field citation. As cross-field publication increases, we suggest that the existence of invisible colleges that link the fields will become more salient.},
keywords = {TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@incollection{HalmCollaborationlearningdesign2005,
title = {Collaboration in Learning Design Using Peer-to-Peer Technologies},
author = {M Halm and U Farooq and Christopher Hoadley},
editor = {Rob Koper and Colin Tattersall},
isbn = {978-3-540-22814-1},
year = {2005},
date = {2005-02-01},
booktitle = {Learning Design: A Handbook on Modelling and Delivering Networked Education and Training},
pages = {203--214},
publisher = {Springer Science & Business Media},
address = {New York},
abstract = {Google-Books-ID: MNQxDKbTpisC},
keywords = {TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {incollection}
}

@incollection{LinnTechnologyGenderEquity2005,
title = {Technology and Gender Equity: What Works?},
author = {M C Linn},
editor = {N F Russo and C Chan and M B Kenkel and C B Travis and M Vasquez},
year = {2005},
date = {2005-01-01},
booktitle = {Women in Science and Technology},
publisher = {American Psychological Association},
address = {New York},
keywords = {MODELS, TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {incollection}
}

@article{HoadleyUsingTechnologyTransform2005,
title = {Using Technology to Transform Communities of Practice into Knowledge-Building Communities},
author = {Christopher M Hoadley and Peter G Kilner},
doi = {10.1145/1067699.1067705},
issn = {2372-7403},
year = {2005},
date = {2005-01-01},
urldate = {2017-11-19},
journal = {SIGGROUP Bull.},
volume = {25},
number = {1},
pages = {31--40},
abstract = {Knowledge and learning exist as byproducts of social processes such as those that take place in communities of practice. We describe two frameworks for understanding and building online knowledge-building communities, or online communities of practice that enhance collective knowledge. First, the C4P framework is described as a way of understanding how knowledge is created and disseminated by participants in a community of practice. Second, we discuss ways in which technology provides added value for learning in these environments using the DDC (Design for Distributed Cognition) framework, and link this to the particular goals of a knowledge-building community. Examples from two large online communities are discussed.},
keywords = {TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{TinkerFreeingEducationalApplications2005,
title = {Freeing Educational Applications},
author = {Robert Tinker},
year = {2005},
date = {2005-01-01},
journal = {@Concord},
volume = {9},
number = {1},
pages = {10},
keywords = {TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{HoadleyMethodologicalAlignmentDesignBased2004,
title = {Methodological Alignment in Design-Based Research},
author = {Christopher M Hoadley},
doi = {10.1207/s15326985ep3904_2},
issn = {0046-1520},
year = {2004},
date = {2004-12-01},
urldate = {2017-11-19},
journal = {Educational Psychologist},
volume = {39},
number = {4},
pages = {203--212},
abstract = {Empirical research is all about trying to model and predict the world. In this article, I discuss how design-based research methods can help do this effectively. In particular, design-based research methods can help with the problem of methodological alignment: ensuring that the research methods we use actually test what we think they are testing. I argue that our current notions of rigor overemphasize certain types of rigor at the expense of others and that design-based research provides an opportunity to select different inferential trade-offs. I describe how 1 design-based research trajectory evolved over time in a way that helped ensure that the learning theories being studied were well represented by the planned interventions and that the interpretation of outcomes was grounded in an understanding of not only the research design, but how the research played out in practice when enacted in real classrooms.},
keywords = {TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{SeethalerGeneticallymodifiedfood2004,
title = {Genetically Modified Food in Perspective: An Inquiry-based Curriculum to Help Middle School Students Make Sense of Tradeoffs},
author = {Sherry Seethaler and Marcia Linn},
doi = {10.1080/09500690410001673784},
issn = {0950-0693},
year = {2004},
date = {2004-11-01},
urldate = {2017-11-19},
journal = {International Journal of Science Education},
volume = {26},
number = {14},
pages = {1765--1785},
abstract = {To understand how students learn about science controversy, this study examines students' reasoning about tradeoffs in the context of a technology-enhanced curriculum about genetically modified food. The curriculum was designed and refined based on the Scaffolded Knowledge Integration Framework to help students sort and integrate their initial ideas and those presented in the curriculum. Pre-test and post-test scores from 190 students show that students made significant (p $<$ 0.0001) gains in their understanding of the genetically modified food controversy. Analyses of students' final papers, in which they took and defended a position on what type of agricultural practice should be used in their geographical region, showed that students were able to provide evidence both for and against their positions, but were less explicit about how they weighed these tradeoffs. These results provide important insights into students' thinking and have implications for curricular design.},
keywords = {TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{WilliamsLearningTeachInquiry2004,
title = {Learning to Teach Inquiry Science in a Technology-Based Environment: A Case Study},
author = {Michelle Williams and Marcia C Linn and Paul Ammon and Maryl Gearhart},
doi = {10.1023/B:JOST.0000031258.17257.48},
issn = {1059-0145, 1573-1839},
year = {2004},
date = {2004-06-01},
urldate = {2017-11-19},
journal = {Journal of Science Education and Technology},
volume = {13},
number = {2},
pages = {189--206},
abstract = {This paper reports on a 2-year study designed to investigate the trajectory of change in an urban 5th grade teacher as she introduces science inquiry using the Web-Based Inquiry Science Environment (WISE). Data for this study included videotapes and transcripts of classroom instruction, and audiotapes and transcripts of interviews conducted with the teacher as she was implementing the curriculum. We also conducted retrospective interviews that enabled us to validate our account of the observational-based changes in the teacher's practices. The results suggest that the teacher's classroom practices shifted over time, from a greater focus on logistics to more of an inquiry orientation. The results further suggest that this shift can be attributed to repeated opportunities to teach a WISE curricular unit. They also show that support from the curriculum and other professionals, allowed the teacher to reflect on how her practices support students' learning.},
keywords = {TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{CuthbertDesigningwebbased2004,
title = {Designing a Web-based Design Curriculum for Middle School Science: The WISE `Houses In The Desert' Project},
author = {Alex J Cuthbert and James D Slotta},
doi = {10.1080/0950069032000119429},
issn = {0950-0693},
year = {2004},
date = {2004-06-01},
urldate = {2017-11-19},
journal = {International Journal of Science Education},
volume = {26},
number = {7},
pages = {821--844},
abstract = {Design activities allow students to create their own solutions, drawing upon a personal understanding of science principles and examples. We created the `Houses in the Desert' project to engage middle school students in designing a passive solar house that will keep its owners comfortable in the desert climate. Students used their knowledge of thermodynamics to evaluate evidence and select between design alternatives. Classroom trials of the initial version (n = 139) of the project revealed four areas where it could be improved: (a) students ignored some relevant science content, (b) there was a lack of diversity in students' designs coupled with a tendency to fixate on initial design ideas, (c) opportunities for students to collaborate and share ideas were rare, and (d) there was limited opportunity for revisiting and revising ideas. We describe the revisions designed to address these challenges, as well as a new set of classroom trials (n = 140). A combination of comparative evaluations and observations of student work are used to evaluate the effectiveness of an instructional framework (Linn and Hsi 2000) for informing revisions to both the curriculum and the technology.},
keywords = {TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@book{LinnInternetEnvironmentsScience2004,
title = {Internet Environments for Science Education},
editor = {Marcia C Linn and Elizabeth A Davis and Philip Bell},
isbn = {978-0-8058-4303-3},
year = {2004},
date = {2004-03-01},
publisher = {Routledge},
address = {Mahwah, N.J},
abstract = {Internet Environments for Science Education synthesizes 25 years of research to identify effective, technology-enhanced ways to convert students into lifelong science learners--one inquiry project at a time. It offers design principles for development of innovations; features tested, customizable inquiry projects that students, teachers, and professional developers can enact and refine; and introduces new methods and assessments to investigate the impact of technology on inquiry learning. The methodology--design-based research studies--enables investigators to capture the impact of innovations in the complex, inertia-laden educational enterprise and to use these findings to improve the innovation. The approach--technology-enhanced inquiry--takes advantage of global, networked information resources, sociocognitive research, and advances in technology combined in responsive learning environments. Internet Environments for Science Education advocates leveraging inquiry and technology to reform the full spectrum of science education activities--including instruction, curriculum, policy, professional development, and assessment. The book offers: *the knowledge integration perspective on learning, featuring the interpretive, cultural, and deliberate natures of the learner; *the scaffolded knowledge integration framework on instruction summarized in meta-principles and pragmatic principles for design of inquiry instruction; *a series of learning environments, including the Computer as Learning Partner (CLP), the Knowledge Integration Environment (KIE), and the Web-based Inquiry Science Environment (WISE) that designers can use to create new inquiry projects, customize existing projects, or inspire thinking about other learning environments; *curriculum design patterns for inquiry projects describing activity sequences to promote critique, debate, design, and investigation in science; *a partnership model establishing activity structures for teachers, pedagogical researchers, discipline experts, and technologists to jointly design and refine inquiry instruction; *a professional development model involving mentoring by an expert teacher; *projects about contemporary controversy enabling students to explore the nature of science; *a customization process guiding teachers to adapt inquiry projects to their own students, geographical characteristics, curriculum framework, and personal goals; and *a Web site providing additional links, resources, and community tools at www.InternetScienceEducation.org},
keywords = {TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {book}
}

@incollection{BellDesignbasedresearcheducation2004,
title = {Design-Based Research in Education},
author = {Philip Bell and Christopher M Hoadley and Marcia C Linn},
editor = {Marcia C Linn and Elizabeth A Davis and Philip Bell},
isbn = {978-0-8058-4303-3},
year = {2004},
date = {2004-03-01},
booktitle = {Internet Environments for Science Education},
pages = {73--88},
publisher = {Routledge},
address = {Mahwah, N.J},
keywords = {TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {incollection}
}

@incollection{HoadleyFosteringcollaborationoffline2004,
title = {Fostering Collaboration Offline and Online: Learning from Each Other},
author = {Christopher M Hoadley},
editor = {Marcia C Linn and Elizabeth A Davis and Philip Bell},
isbn = {978-0-8058-4303-3},
year = {2004},
date = {2004-03-01},
booktitle = {Internet Environments for Science Education},
pages = {145--174},
publisher = {Routledge},
address = {Mahwah, N.J},
keywords = {TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {incollection}
}

@incollection{LinnInquiryTechnology2004,
title = {Inquiry and Technology},
author = {Marcia C Linn and Elizabeth A Davis and Philip Bell},
editor = {Marcia C Linn and Elizabeth A Davis and Philip Bell},
isbn = {978-0-8058-4303-3},
year = {2004},
date = {2004-03-01},
booktitle = {Internet Environments for Science Education},
pages = {3--28},
publisher = {Routledge},
address = {Mahwah, N.J},
keywords = {TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {incollection}
}

@incollection{LinnSpecificDesignPrinciples2004,
title = {Specific Design Principles: Elaborating the Scaffolded Knowledge Integration Framework},
author = {Marcia C Linn and Philip Bell and Elizabeth A Davis},
editor = {Marcia C Linn and Elizabeth A Davis and Philip Bell},
isbn = {978-0-8058-4303-3},
year = {2004},
date = {2004-03-01},
booktitle = {Internet Environments for Science Education},
pages = {315--340},
publisher = {Routledge},
address = {Mahwah, N.J},
keywords = {TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {incollection}
}

@incollection{LinnScaffoldedKnowledgeIntegration2004,
title = {The Scaffolded Knowledge Integration Framework for Instruction},
author = {Marcia C Linn and Elizabeth A Davis and Bat-Sheva Eylon},
editor = {Marcia C Linn and Elizabeth A Davis and Philip Bell},
isbn = {978-0-8058-4303-3},
year = {2004},
date = {2004-03-01},
booktitle = {Internet Environments for Science Education},
pages = {47--72},
publisher = {Routledge},
address = {Mahwah, N.J},
keywords = {TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {incollection}
}

@incollection{ShearPartnershipModelsCase2004,
title = {Partnership Models: The Case of the Deformed Frogs},
author = {L Shear and Philip Bell and Marcia C Linn},
editor = {Marcia C Linn and Elizabeth A Davis and Philip Bell},
isbn = {978-0-8058-4303-3},
year = {2004},
date = {2004-03-01},
booktitle = {Internet Environments for Science Education},
pages = {289--314},
publisher = {Routledge},
address = {Mahwah, N.J},
keywords = {TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {incollection}
}

@article{Carr-ChellmanConclusionLookingback2004,
title = {Conclusion: Looking Back and Looking Forward},
author = {Alison Carr-Chellman and Christopher Hoadley},
year = {2004},
date = {2004-01-01},
journal = {Educational Technology},
volume = {44},
pages = {57--59},
keywords = {TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{Carr-ChellmanIntroductionspecialissue2004,
title = {Introduction to Special Issue: Learning Sciences and Instructional Systems: Beginning the Dialogue},
author = {Alison Carr-Chellman and Christopher Hoadley},
year = {2004},
date = {2004-01-01},
journal = {Educational Technology},
volume = {44},
pages = {5--6},
keywords = {TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{SlottaBiologieunterrichtTippsaus2004,
title = {Biologieunterricht - Tipps Aus Dem Internet. Missbildung Bei Fröschen: Parasiten Oder Chemische Substanzen? Online-Kontroversen in WISE.},
author = {James D Slotta and Frank Fischer},
issn = {1617-5697},
year = {2004},
date = {2004-01-01},
journal = {Praxis der Naturwissenschaften - Biologie in der Schule},
volume = {53},
number = {3},
pages = {38--39},
abstract = {An der Berkeley-Universität wurde in den letzten Jahren eine Internetplattform entwickelt, die zahlreiche Unterrichtsprojekte aus der Biologie und anderen Naturwissenschaften enthält. Hier werden im Unterricht einsetzbare Projekte zur Veranschaulichung naturwissenschaftlicher Phänomene vorgestellt. (Orig.).},
keywords = {TELS},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}